Efficacy and safety of CTLA-4, PD-1 and LAG-3 immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2025-9096Keywords:
Advanced melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, combination immunotherapyAbstract
Advanced unresectable melanoma carries a poor prognosis, with minimal benefit from chemotherapy and limited responsiveness to radiotherapy. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1, CTLA-4, and LAG-3 has transformed treatment outcomes; however, their comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1 and CTLA-4 monotherapies against traditional systemic therapies, as well as the dual regimens PD-1 + CTLA-4 and PD-1 + LAG-3 against their respective monotherapies, in patients with advanced unresectable melanoma. A comprehensive search of PubMed and the Cochrane CENTRAL database was conducted on March 18, 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing ICIs against conventional therapies or other ICI regimens. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Eleven randomized controlled trials (n = 4,111) met the inclusion criteria. The PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination demonstrated the greatest clinical benefit, significantly improving OS (HR = 0.59), PFS (HR = 0.45), and ORR (RR = 3.11) compared with monotherapy, but was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs (RR = 2.14). The PD-1 + LAG-3 regimen showed a moderate yet statistically significant advantage in efficacy over PD-1 monotherapy (OS HR = 0.80) while maintaining better tolerability. PD-1 monotherapy demonstrated greater efficacy and a more favorable safety profile than CTLA-4 monotherapy when each was compared with traditional therapy. In conclusion, PD-1 + CTLA-4 offers the most substantial therapeutic improvement but with considerable toxicity, whereas PD-1 + LAG-3 provides a more balanced efficacy-safety profile. PD-1 monotherapy remains the safest option, though less effective than combination strategies. These findings highlight the evolving role of combination immunotherapies and the potential clinical value of LAG-3 as a novel checkpoint target in melanoma management.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Osama Omar Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors keep the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, CC BY 4.0. This licencse permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
- The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
- Because the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate at the time of publication, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions presented in the publication. The publisher makes no guarantee, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
- The authors can enter into additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version by citing the initial publication in this journal (e.g. publishing in an institutional repository or in a book).
