Research article

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor -173 G > C polymorphism and risk of tuberculosis: A meta-analysis

Mohammad Naderi1, Mohammad Hashemi2[*], Hossein Ansari3

1Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

EXCLI J 2017;16:Doc313

 

Abstract

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to find out the impact of MIF -173 G > C polymorphism on risk of tuberculosis (TB). We conducted a search of case-control studies on the associations of -173 G > C variant of MIF with susceptibility to tuberculosis in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus. We extracted the data from eligible studies and achieved a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between MIF -173 G > C polymorphism and the risk of TB. Odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to find out the impact of MIF -173G > C promoter polymorphism on TB risk. The pooled ORs were calculated for the codominant, dominant, recessive, and allelic model comparison. The findings revealed that MIF -173 G > C variant increased the risk of TB in codominant (OR = 1.54, 95 %CI = 1.26-1.88, p < 0.0001; CG vs GG), and dominant (OR = 1.62, 95 %CI = 1.33-1.96, p < 0.00001; GC+CC vs GG) inheritance models tested. The results suggested that the MIF -173 C allele significantly increased the risk of PTB (OR = 1.49, 95 %CI = 1.28-1.74, p < 0.00001). The findings of this meta-analysis propose that MIF -173 G > C variant is associated with the risk of TB. More case-control studies with well-designed in different ethnic groups and larger sample size are needed to confirm the findings.

Keywords: MIF, polymorphism, tuberculosis, meta-analysis

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB), mainly caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), is a main global public health problem and it is responsible for high mortality and morbidity worldwide particularly in Asia and Africa (Zaman, 2010[33]). World Health Organization (WHO) report proposed that nearly 9 million subjects developed TB in 2014 and 1.5 million people died from the disease (Zumla et al., 2015[35]). Though one third of the world's population has infected latent TB, merely 5-10 % of infected cases will develop the clinical disease (Philips and Ernst, 2012[22]).

Previous studies in animals and humans have shown that, apart from environmental factors, genetic background of the host may play an important role in the development of TB (Bellamy, 2003[3]; Schurr, 2007[27]; Azad et al., 2012[1]; Meilang et al., 2012[19]; Tong et al., 2015[28]). Until now, several gene polymorphisms have been suggested as being associated with susceptibility to TB (Hashemi et al., 2013[11]; Naderi et al., 2014[20][21]; Yang et al., 2016[32]).

Human macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) gene is located on long arm of chromosome 22 (22q11.2). The gene consists of three exons of 205, 173 and 183 bp separated by two introns of 189 and 95 bp (Budarf et al., 1997[4]). A -173 G > C functional variant in the promoter region of MIF seems to affect promoter activity in a cell-type dependent manner (Donn et al., 2002[7]; Renner et al., 2005[23]). MIF protein is a multifunctional cytokine that is made by many types of cells such as epithelial cells as well as cells contribute to the innate and adaptive immune responses (Calandra et al., 1994[6]; Bacher et al., 1997[2]). MIF is known as an immunomodulatory cytokine that involved in the initiation of innate immune response by inducing tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and IL-6 production during microbial infection (Calandra et al., 1995[5]; Roggero et al., 2002[24]; 2004[25]; Marinho et al., 2007[18]).

Several studies investigated the impact of MIF -173 G > C variant on risk of tuberculosis (Gomez et al., 2007[9]; Sadki et al., 2010[26]; Li et al., 2012[15]; Hashemi et al., 2013[11]; Kuai et al., 2016[14]; Liu et al., 2016[16]). The present study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of all eligible studies to evaluate the overall association between the MIF -173 G > C polymorphism and risk of tuberculosis.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was done from database for articles published up to April 04, 2016 without language restriction. The search strategy was “macrophage migration inhibitory factor or MIF” and “polymorphism or variant or mutation or genotype” and tuberculosis. Relevant studies which were eligible for the meta-analysis must meet the following criteria: studies were included in this meta-analysis if the met the following criteria: 1) case-control studies of the correlation between the -173 G > A variant of MIF gene and tuberculosis; 2) studies enrolled more than 30 patients; 3) studies provided the genotype frequencies of MIF -173 G > A polymorphism in both cases and controls. Figure 1(Fig. 1) summarized the process of identifying eligible studies.

Data extraction

Extraction of the data was done by two independently authors. The following data were collected from each study including the first author's name, publication year, ethnicity of participants, genotyping methods of -176 G > C polymorphism, the sample size, and the genotype frequencies of the variant in both cases and controls.

Statistical analysis

We performed the present meta-analysis using RevMan 5.0 software which was provided by the Cochrane Collaboration (Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). All of the data in the studies are dichotomous data expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between MIF -137 G > C gene polymorphism and TB. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for each study was determined by the chi-square test.

Statistical heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the Q-test and I2-test. The pooled ORs were calculated using the fixed-effect inverse variance analysis method or random-effect model (when heterogeneity among the studies was observed) for the allelic comparison (C v G) and genotypic comparisons of codominant (CG vs GG and CC vs GG), dominant (CG +CC vs GG), and recessive (CC vs CG+GG) genetic inheritance models. The significance of the pooled OR was assessed by the Z-test, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Publication bias was estimated by funnel plot.

Results

After our selection, five case-control studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis (Gomez et al., 2007[9]; Sadki et al., 2010[26]; Li et al., 2012[15]; Hashemi et al., 2015[12]; Liu et al., 2016[16]). Characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table 1(Tab. 1).

Five studies involving 929 cases and 876 controls were pooled together for assessment of the overall association between MIF -173 G > C variant and the risk of tuberculosis. As shown in Figure 2(Fig. 2), the finding proposed that the MIF -173 C allele significantly increased the risk of PTB (OR = 1.49, 95 %CI = 1.28-1.74, p < 0.00001). Furthermore, the MIF -173 G > C variant increased the risk of TB in codominant (OR = 1.54, 95 %CI = 1.26-1.88, p < 0.0001; CG vs GG), and dominant (OR = 1.62, 95 %CI = 1.33-1.96, p < 0.00001; GC+CC vs GG) inheritance models tested. But the variant was not associated with TB in recessive inheritance model (OR = 1.46, 95 %CI = 0.73-2.93, p = 0.290; CC vs GC+GG).

A funnel plot was generated as a visual aid to detect risk of publication bias (Figure 3(Fig. 3)).

Discussion

In the current meta-analysis, we summarized all of the available data regarding the association between MIF -173 G > C variant and TB risk. Our findings indicated that MIF -173 G > C polymorphism significantly increased the risk of TB susceptibility in codominant, dominant and allelic models.

MIF plays important functions in regulation of inflammation and innate immune response. Interestingly, MIF signaling pathway counteracts glucocorticoids regulatory effects in immune system. (Xu et al., 2013[31]). Several studies proposed that MIF polymorphism increased the risk of immune disease. Liu et al. (2014[17]) revealed that MIF rs755622 polymorphism may be a risk factor for new-onset Graves' disease in a Taiwanese Chinese population.

A meta-analysis performed by Hao et al (Hao et al., 2013[10]) showed that MIF -173 G > C polymorphism contributed to the susceptibility of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In contrast, the findings of a meta-analysis performed by Falvey et al. (2013[8]) did not support an association between MIF -173 G > C polymorphism and susceptibility to IBD in Caucasian subjects.

Zhang et al. (2015[34]) carried out a meta-analysis to find out the impact of MIF -173 G > C polymorphism and cancer risk. They found that this variant was significant associated with cancer risk. The findings of another meta-analysis proposed that MIF -173 G/C gene polymorphism would be a risk factor for the gastrointestinal cancer and hematological malignancy (Tong et al., 2015[30]).

It has been shown that MIF -173 G > C gene polymorphism may be associated with renal disease susceptibility, particularly in children. Moreover, the findings of a meta-analysis designated that this variant may be related to glucocorticoid resistance in child patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (Tong et al., 2015[29]). A meta-analysis performed by (Kaalla et al., 2013[13]) showed that MIF -173 G > C variant was not associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

There are several limitations of the current meta-analysis. First, only published data were entered in a few databases, consequently a publication bias may have happened. Second, the predisposition to TB is complex and in most cases does not depend on a single gene polymorphism, but somewhat on many gene variants or gene-environment interaction.

In conclusion, the findings of this meta-analysis support an association between MIF -173 G > C variant and risk of TB.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 

References

1. Azad AK, Sadee W, Schlesinger LS. Innate immune gene polymorphisms in tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2012;80:3343-59.
2. Bacher M, Meinhardt A, Lan HY, Mu W, Metz CN, Chesney JA, et al. Migration inhibitory factor expression in experimentally induced endotoxemia. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:235-46.
3. Bellamy R. Susceptibility to mycobacterial infections: the importance of host genetics. Genes Immun. 2003; 4:4-11.
4. Budarf M, McDonald T, Sellinger B, Kozak C, Graham C, Wistow G. Localization of the human gene for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) to chromosome 22q11.2. Genomics. 1997;39:235-6.
5. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, Spiegel LA, Bacher M, Donnelly T, et al. MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature. 1995;377:68-71.
6. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Mitchell RA, Bucala R. The macrophage is an important and previously unrecognized source of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Exp Med. 1994;179:1895-902.
7. Donn R, Alourfi Z, De Benedetti F, Meazza C, Zeggini E, Lunt M, et al. Mutation screening of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene: positive association of a functional polymorphism of macrophage migration inhibitory factor with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2402-9.
8. Falvey JD, Bentley RW, Merriman TR, Hampton MB, Barclay ML, Gearry RB, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease: an association study in New Zealand Caucasians and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6656-64.
9. Gomez LM, Sanchez E, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Lopez-Nevot MA, Anaya JM, Martin J. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene influences the risk of developing tuberculosis in northwestern Colombian population. Tissue Antigens. 2007;70:28-33.
10. Hao NB, He YF, Luo G, Yong X, Zhang Y, Yang SM. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor polymorphism and the risk of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in Asian and European populations: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003729.
11. Hashemi M, Eskandari-Nasab E, Moazeni-Roodi A, Naderi M, Sharifi-Mood B, Taheri M. Association of CTSZ rs34069356 and MC3R rs6127698 gene polymorphisms with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:1224-8.
12. Hashemi M, Sharifi-Mood B, Rasouli A, Amininia S, Naderi M, Taheri M. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor -173 G/C polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary tuberculosis in Zaheda, southeast Iran. EXCLI J. 2015;14:117-22.
13. Kaalla MJ, Broadaway KA, Rohani-Pichavant M, Conneely KN, Whiting A, Ponder L, et al. Meta-analysis confirms association between TNFA-G238A variant and JIA, and between PTPN22-C1858T variant and oligoarticular, RF-polyarticular and RF-positive polyarticular JIA. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013; 11:40.
14. Kuai SG, Ou QF, You DH, Shang ZB, Wang J, Liu J, et al. Functional polymorphisms in the gene encoding macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) are associated with active pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect Dis. 2016;48:222-8.
15. Li Y, Yuan T, Lu W, Chen M, Cheng X, Deng S. Association of tuberculosis and polymorphisms in the promoter region of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in a Southwestern China Han population. Cytokine. 2012;60:64-7.
16. Liu A, Li J, Bao F, Zhu Z, Feng S, Yang J, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in cytokine MIF gene promoter region are closely associated with human susceptibility to tuberculosis in a southwestern province of China. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;39:219-24.
17. Liu YH, Chen CC, Yang CM, Chen YJ, Tsai FJ. Dual effect of a polymorphism in the macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene is associated with new-onset Graves disease in a Taiwanese Chinese population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92849.
18. Marinho CR, Nunez-Apaza LN, Martins-Santos R, Bastos KR, Bombeiro AL, Bucci DZ, et al. IFN-gamma, but not nitric oxide or specific IgG, is essential for the in vivo control of low-virulence Sylvio X10/4 Trypanosoma cruzi parasites. Scand J Immunol. 2007; 66:297-308.
19. Meilang Q, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Tian C, Huang J, et al. Polymorphisms in the SLC11A1 gene and tuberculosis risk: a meta-analysis update. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:437-46.
20. Naderi M, Hashemi M, Pourmontaseri Z, Eskandari-Nasab E, Bahari G, Taheri M. TIRAP rs8177374 gene polymorphism increased the risk of pulmonary tuberculosis in Zahedan, southeast Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7:451-5.
21. Naderi M, Hashemi M, Taheri M, Pesarakli H, Eskandari-Nasab E, Bahari G. CD209 promoter -336 A/G (rs4804803) polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis in Zahedan, southeast Iran. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014;47:171-5.
22. Philips JA, Ernst JD. Tuberculosis pathogenesis and immunity. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:353-84.
23. Renner P, Roger T, Calandra T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to inflammatory diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(Suppl 7):S513-9.
24. Roggero E, Perez A, Tamae-Kakazu M, Piazzon I, Nepomnaschy I, Wietzerbin J, et al. Differential susceptibility to acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice is not associated with a distinct parasite load but cytokine abnormalities. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;128:421-8.
25. Roggero E, Piazzon I, Nepomnaschy I, Perez A, Velikovsky A, Revelli S, et al. Thymocyte depletion during acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection in C57BL/6 mice is partly reverted by lipopolysaccharide pretreatment. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004; 41:123-31.
26. Sadki K, Lamsyah H, Rueda B, Akil E, Sadak A, Martin J, et al. Analysis of MIF, FCGR2A and FCGR3A gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis in Moroccan population. J Genet Genomics. 2010;37:257-64.
27. Schurr E. Is susceptibility to tuberculosis acquired or inherited? J Intern Med. 2007;261:106-11.
28. Tong X, Chen L, Liu S, Yan Z, Peng S, Zhang Y, et al. Polymorphisms in HLA-DRB1 gene and the risk of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis of 31 studies. Lung. 2015;193:309-18.
29. Tong X, He J, Liu S, Peng S, Yan Z, Zhang Y, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor -173G/C gene polymorphism increases the risk of renal disease: a meta-analysis. Nephrology. 2015;20:68-76.
30. Tong X, Zheng B, Tong Q, Liu S, Peng S, Yang X, et al. The MIF -173G/C gene polymorphism increase gastrointestinal cancer and hematological malignancy risk: evidence from a meta-analysis and FPRP test. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:15949-57.
31. Xu L, Li Y, Sun H, Zhen X, Qiao C, Tian S, et al. Current developments of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) inhibitors. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18:592-600.
32. Yang PL, He XJ, Zang QJ, Li HP, Wang GY, Qin J. Association of human leukocyte antigen DRB1 polymorphism and tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20:121-8.
33. Zaman K. Tuberculosis: a global health problem. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28:111-3.
34. Zhang X, Weng W, Xu W, Wang Y, Yu W, Tang X, et al. The association between the migration inhibitory factor -173G/C polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:601-13.
35. Zumla A, George A, Sharma V, Herbert RH, Baroness Masham of Iton, Oxley A, et al. The WHO. 2014 global tuberculosis report - further to go. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(1):e10-2.
 
 

Figure 1: Flow chart of literature screening and selection in the meta-analysis

Figure 2: Forest plot of tuberculosis risk associated with MIF -173 G > C polymorphism. 2A. Allelic model (C vs G). 2B. Codominant model (CG vs GG). 2C. Codominant model (CC vs GG). 2D. Dominant model (CG+CC vs GG). 2E. Recessive model (CC vs CG+GG). The squares and horizontal lines correspond to the study-specific OR and 95 % CI, respectively. The area of the squares reflects the study-specific weight. The diamond represents the pooled results of OR and 95 % CI.

Figure 3: Funnel plots in the meta-analysis of the association between MIF -173 G > C polymorphism and tuberculosis risk. 3A. Allelic model (C vs G). 3B. Codominant model (CG vs GG). 3C. Codominant model (CC vs GG). 3D. Dominant model (CG+CC vs GG). 3E. Recessive model (CC vs CG+GG).

 

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of all included study

[*] Corresponding Author:

PhD, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry Mohammad Hashemi, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, postal code: 98167-43181, Iran; Tel: +985433295791, Fax: +98 5433295796, eMail: mhd.hashemi@gmail.com