Guest editorial

Highlight report: Monitoring cytochrome P450 activities in living hepatocytes

Ahmed Ghallab1[*]

1Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt

EXCLI J 2017;16:Doc1330

 



Recently, Jannick Theobald and Xinlai Cheng from Heidelberg University published a methods' paper how to monitor cytochrome P450 (CYP) activities in living hepatocytes (Theobald et al., 2017[15]). For this purpose, the authors used substrates that are metabolized by CYP enzymes thereby forming highly fluorescent leaving groups that were quantified by a plate reader. This technique allows repeated real-time measurements of cultivated hepatocytes over extincted time periods (Theobald et al., 2017[15]). The monitoring technique was validated by the use of CYP inducers and was applied to characterize differentiating HepaRG cells. The authors conclude that the fluorescence-based assay can easily be used as a tool to characterize hepatocyte in vitro systems.

Hepatotoxicity still represents a major challenge in drug development (Leist et al., 2017[8]; Schenk et al., 2017[12]; Reif et al., 2017[11]; Jansen et al., 2017[6]; Crespo Yanguas et al., 2016[3]; Stöber, 2015[13], 2016[14]; Yanguas et al., 2016[19]; Braeuning and Schwarz, 2016[2]).

Currently, much effort is invested to develop improved hepatocyte in vitro systems (Godoy et al., 2013[5]; Ramboer et al., 2015[10]; Verhulst et al., 2015[18]; Pfeiffer et al., 2015[9]; Kim et al., 2015[7]) and in silico techniques (Ghallab et al., 2016[4]; Bartl et al., 2015[1]; Vartak et al., 2016[17]; Thiel et al., 2015[16]). The technique presented by Theobald and colleagues can easily be integrated into in vitro systems and should therefore facilitate characterization of cultivated hepatocytes.

 

References

1. Bartl M, Pfaff M, Ghallab A, Driesch D, Henkel SG, Hengstler JG, et al. Optimality in the zonation of ammonia detoxification in rodent liver. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89:2069-78.
2. Braeuning A, Schwarz M. Is the question of phenobarbital as potential liver cancer risk factor for humans really resolved? Arch Toxicol. 2016;90:1525-6.
3. Crespo Yanguas S, Willebrords J, Maes M, da Silva TC, Veloso Alves Pereira I, Cogliati B, et al. Connexins and pannexins in liver damage. EXCLI J. 2016;15:177-86.
4. Ghallab A, Cellière G, Henkel SG, Driesch D, Hoehme S, Hofmann U, et al. Model-guided identification of a therapeutic strategy to reduce hyperammonemia in liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2016;64:860–71.
5. Godoy P, Hewitt NJ, Albrecht U, Andersen ME, Ansari N, Bhattacharya S, et al. Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87:1315-530.
6. Jansen PL, Ghallab A, Vartak N, Reif R, Schaap FG, Hampe J, et al. The ascending pathophysiology of cholestatic liver disease. Hepatology. 2017;65:722-38.
7. Kim JY, Fluri DA, Marchan R, Boonen K, Mohanty S, Singh P, et al. 3D spherical microtissues and microfluidic technology for multi-tissue experiments and analysis. J Biotechnol. 2015;205:24-35.
8. Leist M, Ghallab A, Graepel R, Marchan R, Hassan R, Bennekou SH, et al. Adverse outcome pathways: opportunities, limitations and open questions. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91:3477-505.
9. Pfeiffer E, Kegel V, Zeilinger K, Hengstler JG, Nüssler AK, Seehofer D, et al. Featured article: Isolation, characterization, and cultivation of human hepatocytes and non-parenchymal liver cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015;240:645-56.
10. Ramboer E, Rogiers V, Vanhaecke T, Vinken M. Effects of Trichostatin A on drug uptake transporters in primary rat hepatocyte cultures. EXCLI J. 2015;14:567-76.
11. Reif R, Ghallab A, Beattie L, Günther G, Kuepfer L, Kaye PM, et al. In vivo imaging of systemic transport and elimination of xenobiotics and endogenous molecules in mice. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91:1335-52.
12. Schenk A, Ghallab A, Hofmann U, Hassan R, Schwarz M, Schuppert A, et al. Physiologically-based modelling in mice suggests an aggravated loss of clearance capacity after toxic liver damage. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6224.
13. Stöber R. Drug-induced mitochondrial impairment in liver cells. EXCLI J. 2015;14:1297-9.
14. Stöber R. Pathophysiology of cholestatic liver disease and its relevance for in vitro tests of hepatotoxicity. EXCLI J. 2016;15:870-1.
15. Theobald J, Cheng X, Ghanem A, Gaitantzi H, Song G, Klipp E, et al. Monitoring cytochrome P450 activity in living hepatocytes by chromogenic substrates in response to drug treatment or during cell maturation. Arch Toxicol. 2017 Dec 5. [Epub ahead of print].
16. Thiel C, Schneckener S, Krauss M, Ghallab A, Hofmann U, Kanacher T, et al. A systematic evaluation of the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for cross-species extrapolation. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:191-206.
17. Vartak N, Damle-Vartak A, Richter B, Dirsch O, Dahmen U, Hammad S, et al. Cholestasis-induced adaptive remodeling of interlobular bile ducts. Hepatology. 2016;63:951-64.
18. Verhulst S, Best J, van Grunsven LA, Dollé L. Advances in hepatic stem/progenitor cell biology. EXCLI J. 2015;14:33-47.
19. Yanguas SC, Cogliati B, Willebrords J, Maes M, Colle I, van den Bossche B, et al. Experimental models of liver fibrosis. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90:1025-48.
 
 
 

[*] Corresponding Author:

Ahmed Ghallab, Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt, eMail: ghallab@vet.svu.edu.eg