Research article

Anacardium microcarpum extract and fractions protect against paraquat-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster

Katiane Raquel Müller1, Illana Kemmerich Martins1, Nathane Rosa Rodrigues1, Litiele Cezar da Cruz2, Valter Menezes Barbosa Filho2,3, Giulianna Echeverria Macedo1, Gustavo Felipe da Silva1, Jean Paul Kamdem3, Irwin Rose Alencar de Menezes4, Jeferson Luis Franco1, Thaís Posser1[*]

1Oxidative Stress and Cell Signaling Research Group, Centro Interdisciplinar de Pesquisa em Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Pampa, Campus São Gabriel, 97300-000 São Gabriel, RS, Brazil

2Departamento de Química, Programa de Pós Graduação em Bioquímica Toxicológica, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97105-900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil

3Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Regional do Cariri, 63100-000 Crato, CE, Brazil

4Departamento de Química Biológica, Universidade Regional do Cariri, 63100-000 Crato, CE, Brazil

EXCLI J 2017;16:Doc302



Anacardium microcarpum Ducke (Anacardiaceae) is a native species of Brazil used in folk medicine for the treatment of several illnesses although its antioxidant activity has been reported in vitro, there is no evidence of this effect in an in vivo model. Here, we investigated the potential protective effect of hydroalcoholic extract (AMHE), methanol (AMMF) and acetate (AMAF) fraction of A. microcarpum against paraquat toxicity on survivorship, locomotor performance, antioxidant enzymes activity and reactive species using Drosophila melanogaster. Flies were exposed to the extract or fractions (1 and 10 mg/ml) in the presence or absence of paraquat (5 mM) in sucrose solution for 72 h. In addition, total phenolic content of extract and fractions was evaluated as well as ABTS radical scavenging capacity. Our results demonstrated that AMAF presented higher content of phenols and ABTS chelating potential. Treatment of flies with the extract or fractions did not alter the survivorship, locomotor ability, and acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activity per se. Paraquat caused 85 % mortality of flies and 30 % increase in reactive species generation, which were significantly attenuated by AMHE and AMMF. AAMF increased catalase activity (from 66.77 ± 6.64 to 223.94 ± 25.92 mU/mg of protein), while AMAF increased GST activity (from 477.76 ± 92 to 770.19 ± 147.92 mU/mg of protein) and catalase activity (from 66.77 ± 6.64 to 220.54 ± 26.63 mU/mg of protein). AMHE and AMMF were more effective in protecting against paraquat toxicity. Taken together, the data indicate the potential of this plant in acting as a protective and antioxidant agent in vivo.

Keywords: cajuí, Drosophila melanogaster, antioxidant, neuroprotection, herbicide


The genus Anacardium (family: Anacardiaceae) is composed of a relatively small number of species (about 20) native to tropical regions of the Americas. One of its species that has generated considerable interest in the past few years is Anacardium microcarpum Ducke. It is a native species from Brazil, found in the Northeast region where it is popularly known as “cajuí”. The fruits of this species differ from those of Anacardium occidentale L., the most representative species from this genus, by its smaller drupe and hypocarb, making it commercially less valuable (Vieira et al., 2014[35]). The infusions of barks of A. microcarpum have been used in Brazilian folk medicine for the treatment of a variety of illness, such as inflammation, rheumatism, tumor and infectious diseases (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]).

Although the pharmacological properties of A. occidentale is well documented, very little is known for A. microcarpum. Recently, our research group demonstrated the antioxidant potential of A. microcarpum and absence of toxicity in a variety of in vitro assays system (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]). Moreover, it presented synergism with commercial antibiotics, against resistant bacterial strains (Barbosa-Filho et al., 2015[7]). Additionally, the presence of several compounds with recognized antioxidant and protective potential such as gallic acid, catechin, caffeic acid, quercetin among others was identified in A. microcarpum extracts (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]).

Paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4-4′-bipyridynium dichloride), is a quaternary ammonium herbicide widely used in agriculture. When administered in vivo, it undergoes NADPH-dependent reduction, generating a stable paraquat radical, which reacts with oxygen to generate superoxide anion, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Bus and Gibson, 1984[10]). ROS generated directly or indirectly by paraquat can cause lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, oxidation of protein thiols and DNA damage, leading to cell death. Substantial evidence from the literature indicates that paraquat causes oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction thereby disturbing ATP production (Mitra et al., 2011[24]; Hosamani and Muralidhara, 2013[18]). Chronic paraquat exposure has been identified as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease. Numerous studies reveal that this herbicide induces dopaminergic cell loss in animal models (Liou et al., 1996[23], Franco et al., 2010[16]; Mitra et al., 2011[24]).

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is extensively used as an alternative model organism in biomedical research since it raises few ethical concerns and offers many benefits. Of particular importance, 75 % of the genes that cause disease in human are also found in D. melanogaster (Pandey and Nichols, 2011[28]; Narayanan and Rothenfluh, 2016[25]). For instance, neurodegeneration and inflammatory events with similar features to those observed in patients with Parkinson's disease have been observed in this model (Dalui and Bhattacharyya, 2014[12]). In addition, its short reproductive cycle (8-14 days) associated with the fact that it is inexpensive to maintain in the laboratory makes it an attractive model. Furthermore, this model has been shown to be a powerful model system for the study of fundamental cellular pathways responsible for metal and other chemicals induced toxicity (Ahamed et al., 2010[3]; Bonilla-Ramirez et al., 2011[8]; Abolaji et al., 2014[1]; Paula et al., 2014[29]).

Taking into account the promising potential of A. microcarpum as a natural antioxidant, we hypothesized that it may offer protection against paraquat toxicity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the potential toxicity and protective effect of A. microcarpum against locomotor deficits and oxidative stress promoted by paraquat using D. melanogaster as a model organism.

Materials and Methods


Dimetilsulfoxide, quercetin, 5,5′-Dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), Acetylcholine iodide, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzeno, 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCHF-DA), Folin-Ciocalteu, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid diammonium salt, sodium acetate, HEPES, minimum 99,5 % titration, 2,4,6-Tris(2-pyridyl)-5-triazine (TPTZ), methyl viologen dichloride hydrate (Paraquat), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), resazurin sodium salt, and albumin from bovine serum were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (São Paulo, SP, Brasil). Potassium ferrocyanidetrihydrate, zinc acetate dihydrate, iron (II) ammonium sulfate hexahydrate, gallic acid monohydrate, aluminum chloride hexahydrate, potassium persulfate were purchased from Vetec Química Fina LTDA (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BRA). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Plant collection and extractions

The stem barks of A. microcarpum were collected from Barrero Grande, Crato-Ceará (7°22_S; 39°28_W; 892 m sea level), Brazil, in November 2011. The plant material was identified by Dr. Maria Arlene Pessoa da Silva of the herbarium Caririense Dárdano de Andrade - Lima (HCDAL) of the Regional University of Cariri (URCA) and a voucher specimen was deposited (number 6702). The fresh barks of A. microcarpum were macerated with 99.9 % of ethanol and water (1:1, v/v) for 3 days. The suspension was filtered and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure, and lyophilized to obtain 490 g of crude ethanolic extract. One hundred and fifty grams (150 g) of this was partitioned with ethyl acetate and methanol to obtain 12.5 g of ethyl acetate fraction and 105.23 g of methanolic fraction (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]). All the fractions were stored in the freezer and resuspended in water prior to experiments.

Analysis of in vitro antioxidant activity of extract and fractions

The analysis of in vitro antioxidant potential of ethanolic extract and fractions (methanolic and ethyl acetate) were performed in 96 well plates using the EnSpire® multimode plate reader (Perkin Elmer, USA) at concentrations of 1 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL and 400 μg/mL dissolved in distilled water.

Total phenolics

Phenolic compounds from ethanolic extract and fractions samples were detected by the Folin-Ciocalteu method (Singleton et al., 1999[34]) with minor modifications. Briefly, 4 μL of the samples was mixed with 35 μL of 1 N Folin-Ciocalteu's reagent. After 3 min, 70 µL of 15 % Na2CO3 solution was added to the mixture and adjusted to 284 μL with distilled water. The reaction was kept in the dark for 2 h, after which the absorbance was read at 760 nm. Gallic acid was used as standard (10 - 300 μg/mL). The results were expressed as mg of Gallic acid equivalents (GAEs) per 100 g of extract or fractions.

ABTS radical scavenging assay

The antioxidant activity of extract and fractions sample in the reaction with ABTS radical was determined according to method of Re et al. (1999[31]) with some modifications. Briefly, ABTS radical solution was generated by oxidation of solutions composed of 1 mL of 7 mM 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt stock solution and 17.5 μL of 140 mM potassium persulfate (K2S2O8). The mixture was left to stand in the dark at room temperature for 12-16 hours before use. For the evaluation of antioxidant capacity, the ABTS solution was diluted with distilled water to obtain the absorbance of 0.700 ± 0.020 at 734 nm. 200 μL of ABTS solution were mixed with 2 μL of sample and 48 μL of distillated water in a microplate and the decrease in the absorbance was measured after 10 min. Ascorbic acid (1 mM) was used as a positive control. The radical scavenging activity (RSA) was calculated by the formula % RSA = [(AB - AA)/AB] x 100; where RSA = ABTS scavenging; AB = absorption of a blank sample (only ABTS); AA = absorption of a tested sample.

Drosophila stock and culture

D. melanogaster (Harwich strain) was obtained from the National Species Stock Center, Bowling Green, OH. The flies were reared in 2.5 X 6.5 cm2 glass bottles containing 10 mL of standard medium mixture of 39 % coarse and 32 % medium corn flour, 10 % wheat germ, 14 % sugar, 2 % milk powder, 1 % salt, 1 % soybean flour, 1 % rye flour, 0.02 % of methylparaben and 0.02 % of lyophilized yeast. All experiments were performed with the same strain and both sexes were used at random with age between 1-4 days post eclosion.

Treatment of flies

In order to evaluate the toxicity of A. microcarpum hydroethanolic extract (AMHE), metanolic fraction (AMMF) and acetate fraction (AMAF), 25 flies of both genders were exposed to 1 and 10 mg/mL of AMHE, AMMF or AMAF for 5 consecutive days. It should be stressed that the extract or fractions was mixed with the standard medium prior exposure. Treatments were compared with control group that received standard medium only.

To evaluate the protective potential of AMHE, AMMF and AMAF against paraquat toxicity, flies were divided in groups of 25 flies of both genders and exposed to different treatments: 1 % sucrose (control group), 5 mM paraquat, 1 and 10 mg/mL of AMHE, AMMF and AMAF alone or in combination with 5 mM paraquat. All solutions were diluted in 1 % sucrose and a volume of 500 µL was added to a filter paper in the base of flies vials. The number of dead flies was registered for a period of 3 days (72 h). This was chosen on the basis that no mortality or behavioral alteration was noted. At the end of the treatment, behavioral and biochemical analyses were conducted.

Cellular viability of flies

The viability assay was performed by resazurin reduction assay. The method uses the indicator resazurin to measure the metabolic capacity of cells. Groups of 20 flies treated for 72 hours with extract or fractions mixed in culture medium were mechanically homogenized in 1 mL 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0) and centrifuged at 1,600 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was incubated in the Elisa plates with 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0) and resazurin for 2 h. After this period, the fluorescence emission was read using EnsPire® multimode plate reader (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) at excitation wavelength of 560 nm and emission wavelength of 590 nm.

Activity of antioxidant enzymes

For analysis of antioxidant enzymes activity, twenty flies were homogenized in 200 μL of Tris buffer (20 mM, pH 7.0), then centrifuged at 1.000 g for 5 minutes at 4 °C. An aliquot of the supernatant was used for the determination of acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activity (Franco et al., 2009[15]; Ellman et al., 1961[14]). The remained supernatant was then centrifuged at 20.000 g for 30 minutes at 4 °C and then used to measure Calatase (CAT; EC, Glutathione-S-transferase (GST; EC and superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC CAT activity was assayed following the clearance of H2O2 at 240 nm in a reaction media containing 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.5 mM EDTA, 10 mM H2O2, 0.012 %TRITONX100 as described by Aebi (1984[2]). The GST activity was assayed following the procedure of Habig and Jakoby (1981[17]) using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as substrate. The assay is based on the formation of the conjugated complex of CDNB and GSH at 340 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM GSH and 2.5 mM CDNB. SOD activity assay was performed as described by Kostyuk and Potapovich (1989[21]). The assay consists in the inhibition of superoxide driven oxidation of quercetin by SOD at 406 nm. The complete reaction system consisted of 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 10), 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.8 mM TEMED and 0.05 μM quercetin. The enzyme activities were expressed in milliunits per milligram of total protein content, which was quantified following Bradford (1976[9]).

Negative geotaxis assay

Locomotor ability was determined using the negative geotaxis assay as described by Coulom and Birman (2004[11]). For the experiment, five flies from each group were ice-anaesthetized and placed in a vertical plastic tube (15 cm length). After 30 minutes of recovery, the number of flies that reach 8 cm up the tube and the flies that remained below this mark after 6 seconds were registered. The experiment was repeated three times with intervals of one minute.

DCF-DA oxidation assay

Groups of 20 flies were mechanically homogenized in 1 mL 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0), and centrifuged at 1,600 g for 10 min, 4 °C. The supernatant was used to quantify 2′-7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) oxidation as a general index of ROS formation as described by Perez-Severiano et al. (2004[30]). The fluorescence emission of DCF resulting from DCF-DA oxidation was monitored at regular intervals (488 nm excitation and 530 nm emission) in an EnsPire® multimode plate reader (PerkinElmer, USA). The graph expresses the fluorescence after 60 min of incubation with the fluorescent compound.

Statistical analysis

All the procedures were made in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. The results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.


Phenol content and in vitro antioxidant activity

The in vitro antioxidant property of A. microcarpum crude extract and fractions evaluated by the ABTS assay is shown in Table 1(Tab. 1). The content of total phenols varied among samples. AMAF presented the higher phenolic content (103.3 ± 1.25 g GAE/100 g of sample) followed by AMHE (79.66 ± 1.74) and AMMF (70.33 ± 3.10). The antioxidant activity of A. microcarpum was tested by its ability to neutralize ABTS radical. AMAF exhibited highest ABTS radical scavenging activity (Table 1(Tab. 1)). The characterization of specific phenolic and flavonoid compounds was already identified in crude extract and fractions by our research group (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]) using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The extract and fractions contained caffeic acid, quercetin and isoquercetin among others, that can be at least in part, responsible for its antioxidant activity.

Survival of flies exposed to A. microcarpum

The effects of A. microcarpum exposure on fly's survival were evaluated during five days. As showed in Figure 1(Fig. 1), long term consumption of extract or fractions did not affect the survival of flies when comparing to control group, even at the highest concentration tested (10 mg/mL). Further analysis was performed after 72 hours of exposure to the extract or fractions mixed with medium.

Cell viability of flies exposed to A. microcarpum

Flies were exposed for 72 hours to A. microcarpum extract or fractions. After this period, cellular viability was evaluated in the homogenates of whole body of flies through Rezaruzin reduction assay as a measurement of metabolic activity of cells. As shown in Figure 2(Fig. 2) the metabolic activity of flies was significantly increased in all concentrations of extract and fractions tested. Similar results were observed in MTT test (data not shown).

Antioxidant enzyme activity of flies exposed to A. microcarpum

The treatment with A. microcarpum caused significant increase (p < 0.05) in GST activity of flies treated with 10 mg/mL of AMAF (from 477.76 ± 92 to 770.19 ± 147.92 mU/mg of protein). Catalase activity was significantly increased in flies treated with 10 mg/mL of AMMF (from 66.77 ± 6.64 to 223.94 ± 25.92 mU/mg of protein) and AMAF (from 66.77 ± 6.64 to 220.54 ± 26.63) at 10 mg/mL. However, AMHE at all the concentrations tested did not change the activity of the enzymes when compared with the control (p > 0.05). No alteration in AchE activity was observed in response to the treatments (Table 2(Tab. 2)).

Effects of A. microcarpum and paraquat on flies survival

The consumption of extract or fractions by flies did not alter survival of flies when comparing with the control (considered as 100 %). However paraquat caused a 85 % decrease in flies survivorship compared with the control (p < 0.05; Figure 3(Fig. 3)). The co-exposure of AMHE and paraquat resulted in a concentration dependent blockage of paraquat induced mortality. AMMF at concentrations of 1 and 10 mg/mL prevented against paraquat induced flies death. In contrast, AMAF did not provide protection against death caused by paraquat (Figure 3(Fig. 3)).

Effects of A. microcarpum and paraquat on flies locomotor activity

Negative geotaxis consists in the ability of flies to fly vertically when startled and it is a common measure of locomotor behaviour (Rhodenizer et al., 2008[32]). Exposure to A. microcarpum extract and fractions did not alter locomotor performance of flies when compared with the control (p < 0.05). Exposure of flies to paraquat significantly impaired flies locomotor ability when compared with the control (Figure 4(Fig. 4), p < 0.05). About 70 % of paraquat-treated flies remained below the line, indicating locomotor deficit caused by paraquat. At concentration of 1 mg/mL, crude extract (AMHE) prevented partially while AMAF and AMMF restored the locomotor deficit caused by paraquat (Figure 4(Fig. 4)). The concentration of 10 mg/ mL of the extract and fractions completely prevented locomotor deficit caused by paraquat (Figure 4(Fig. 4)).

Effects of A. microcarpum and paraquat on reactive species production in flies

Paraquat toxicity is mainly attributed to its oxidant character causing ROS generation. As depicted in Figure 5(Fig. 5), paraquat-exposed flies showed significant increase in ROS production when compared with the control (p < 0.05). AMHE and AMAF per se decreased the basal level of DCF fluorescence at the highest concentration tested. Generally, AMHE and AMMF at concentration of 1 and 10 mg/mL protected flies against paraquat-induced ROS generation. AMAF showed antioxidant effect against paraquat-induced ROS production, only at 1 mg/mL (Figure 5(Fig. 5)).


The understanding of the etiology and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases is a challenge and so far no definite cure has been found. In this sense, there is a need to identify compounds capable of preventing and/or reversing neurological damage (Kamdem et al. 2016[20]). It is known that oxidative stress is a common factor in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases and age-related degenerative processes. Levels of reactive species, lipid oxidation products, protein oxidation and DNA oxidation are elevated in brain of Alzheimer disease patients (Franco et al., 2010[16]). In this regard, several antioxidant compounds derived from natural sources have demonstrated neuroprotective potential in vitro and in vivo models. Among these are flavonoid polyphenols like epigallocatechin 3-gallate from green tea and quercetin from apple, non-flavonoid polyphenols such as curcumin from turmeric and resveratrol from grape (Ataie et al., 2016[4]; Huang and Adachi, 2016[19]).

A number of epidemiologic studies have found an association between Parkinson's disease and exposure to pesticides (for review: Baltazar et al., 2014[5]; Sanchez-Santed et al., 2016[33]). In this study, the neurotoxin paraquat impaired locomotor performance of flies, and decreased survivorship. These effects were not observed when A. microcarpum was present in the medium. This beneficial effect of A. microcarpum may be at least in part attributed to the presence of quercetin, isoquercetrin, ellagic acid and caffeic acid previously identified in the extract and fractions by our research group (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]). These compounds are well known as potent antioxidants.

Although the in vitro antioxidant potential of this plant has been demonstrated, there was no knowledge about this effect in vivo. Herein, the consumption of A. microcarpum methanolic and acetate fraction improved the endogen activity of antioxidant enzyme catalase, which is responsible for the degradation of hydrogen peroxide, a reactive species prone to cause damage to biomolecules (Aebi, 1984[2]). This effect could be attributed to a modulation of gene expression of enzyme, leading to its augmented levels. The literature shows that the consumption of cranberry extract by D. melanogaster induced mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD and protected against damage induced by hydrogen peroxide (Wang et al., 2015[36]). Moreover fruit flies carrying copies of SOD1 and CAT genes exhibited a one-third extension of lifespan, lower amount of protein oxidative damage and delayed loss in physical performance (Orr and Sohal, 1994[26]). Thus, the induction of antioxidant enzymes activity showed in this study could be beneficial for flies and confer increased resistance to oxidative damage.

The GST enzyme activity was augmented following treatment with acetate fraction. This enzyme participates in phase II detoxifying process and acts in the inactivation of toxic molecules from endogenous and exogenous sources converting them into water-soluble compounds. In other studies, Ginkgo biloba extract and metabolites was able to increase the activity of GST in Hyphantria cunea larvae (Pan et al., 2016[27]). In the current study, only the highest concentration of acetate fraction increased the activity of this enzyme; such fact could be attributed in part to a higher concentration of several constituents such as flavonoids and polyphenols, as verified by HPLC studies (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]). High concentration of flavonoids was shown to be toxic in cell culture model causing an oxidative damage and mitochondrial failure (Lee et al., 2015[22]). Acetate fraction was not able to avoid the drop in survivorship caused by paraquat. This result draws attention to the fact that the in vitro antioxidant potential of the extract is not an indicative of a superior protective activity in vivo. Accordingly, previous study performed by our research group demonstrated a superior DPPH scavenging potential for AMAF but its protective potential in brain tissue homogenate was lower than AMHE (Barbosa Filho et al., 2014[6]).

In conclusion, our study demonstrates for the first time that hydroalcoholic extract and fractions of A. microcarpum are able to protect against the toxicity promoted by the neurotoxin paraquat in vivo. This effect could be attributed to the antioxidant potential of this plant, which was evidenced by its potential in improving activity of antioxidant enzymes and neutralizing ROS generated directly or indirectly by paraquat. Our data draw attention to the potentiality of A. microcarpum as a source of chemical components with neuroprotective action in vivo without causing toxicity.


The authors thank Universidade Federal do Pampa, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 456207/2014-7), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Fapergs 2380-2551/14-8). Dr. Jean Paul Kamdem acknowledges the financial support of FUNCAP, CNPq and CAPES.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



1. Abolaji AO, Kamdem JP, Lugokenski TH, Nascimento TK, Waczuk EP, Farombi EO, et al. Involvement of oxidative stress in 4-vinylcyclohexene-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;71:99-108.
2. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6.
3. Ahamed M, Posgai R, Gorey TJ, Nielsen M, Hussain SM, Rowe JJ. Silver nanoparticles induced heat shock protein 70, oxidative stress and apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;242:263–9.
4. Ataie A, Shadifar M, Ataee R. Polyphenolic antioxidants and neuronal regeneration. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016;7:81-90.
5. Baltazar MT, Dinis-Oliveira RJ, de Lourdes Bastos M, Tsatsakis AM, Duarte JA, Carvalho F. Pesticides exposure as etiological factors of Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disease - a mechanistic approach. Toxicol Lett. 2014;230:85-103.
6. Barbosa Filho VM, Waczuk EP, Kamdem JP, Abolaji AO, Lacerda SR, da Costa JGM, et al. Phytochemical constituents, antioxidant activity, cytotoxicity and osmotic fragility effects of Caju (Anacardium microcarpum). Industr Crops Prod. 2014;55:280-8.
7. Barbosa-Filho VM, Waczuk EP, Leite NF, Menezes IR, da Costa JG, Lacerda SR, et al. Phytocompounds and modulatory effects of Anacardium microcarpum (cajui) on antibiotic drugs used in clinical infections. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:5965-72.
8. Bonilla-Ramirez L, Jimenez-Del-Rio M, Velez-Pardo C. Acute and chronic metal exposure impairs locomotion activity in Drosophila melanogaster: A model to study Parkinsonism. Biometals. 2011;24:1045–57.
9. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248-54.
10. Bus JS, Gibson JE. Paraquat: model for oxidant-initiated toxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 1984;55:37-46.
11. Coulom H, Birman S. Chronic exposure to rotenone models sporadic Parkinson's disease in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10993-8.
12. Dalui S, Bhattacharyya A. Herbicide paraquat induces sex-specific variation of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Drosophila melanogaster. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2014;51:567-73.
13. de Oliveira MR, Ferreira GC, Schuck PF. Protective effect of carnosic acid against paraquat-induced redox impairment and mitochondrial dysfunction in SH-SY5Y cells: Role for PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016;32:41-54.
14. Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Feather-Stone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961;7:88-95.
15. Franco JL, Posser T, Dunkley PR, Dickson PW, Mattos JJ, Martins R, et al. Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:449-57.
16. Franco R, Li S, Rodriguez-Rocha H, Burns M, Panayiotidis MI. Molecular mechanisms of pesticide-induced neurotoxicity: Relevance to Parkinson's disease. Chem Biol Interact. 2010;188:289-300.
17. Habig WH, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases (rat and human). Methods Enzymol. 1981;77:218-31.
18. Hosamani R, Muralidhara. Acute exposure of Drosophila melanogaster to paraquat causes oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2013;83:25-40.
19. Huang Z, Adachi H. Natural compounds preventing neurodegenerative diseases through autophagic activation. J Uoeh. 2016;38:139-48.
20. Kamdem JP, Abolaji AO, Elekofehinti OO, Omotuyi IO, Ibrahim M, Hassan W, et al. therapeutic potential of plant extracts and phytochemicals against brain ischemia-reperfusion injury: a review. Nat Prod J. 2016;6:250-84.
21. Kostyuk VA, Potapovich AI. Superoxide - driven oxidation of quercetin and a simple sensitive assay for determination of superoxide dismutase. Biochem Int. 1989;19:1117-24.
22. Lee W-J, Hsiao M, Chang J-L, Yang S-F, Tseng T-H, Cheng C-W, et al. Quercetin induces mitochondrial‑derived apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-mediated ERK activation in HL‑60 leukemia cells and xenograft. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89:1103-17.
23. Liou HH, Chen RC, Tsai YF, Chen WP, Chang YC, Tsai MC. Effects of paraquat on the substantianigra of the wistar rats: neurochemical, histological, and behavioral studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996;137:34-41.
24. Mitra S, Chakrabarti N, Bhattacharyya A. Differential regional expression patterns of alpha-synuclein, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta;and variable status of dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mouse brain after Paraquat treatment. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:163.
25. Narayanan AS, Rothenfluh A. Believe I can fly! Use of Drosophila as a model organism in neuropsychopharmacology research. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:1439-46.
26. Orr WC, Sohal RS. Extension of life-span by overexpression of superoxide dismutase and catalase in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1994;263:1128-30.
27. Pan L, Ren L, Chen F, Feng Y, Luo Y. Antifeedant activity of Ginkgo biloba secondary metabolites against hyphantriacunea larvae: mechanisms and applications. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155682.
28. Pandey UB, Nichols CD. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:411–36.
29. Paula MT, Zemolin AP, Vargas AP, Golombieski RM, Loreto ELS, Saidelles AP, et al. Effects of Hg(II) exposure on MAPK phosphorylation and antioxidant system in D. melanogaster. Environ Toxicol. 2014;29:621-30.
30. Perez-Severiano F, Rodriguez-Perez M, Pedraza-Chaverri J, Maldonado PD, Medina-Campos ON, Ortiz-Plata A, et al. S-Allylcysteine, a garlic-derived antioxidant, ameliorates quinolinic acid-induced neurotoxicity and oxidative damage in rats. Neurochem Int. 2004;458:1175-83.
31. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cationdecolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:1231-7.
32. Rhodenizer D, Martin I, Bhandari P, Pletcher SD, Grotewiel M. Genetic and environmental factors impact age-related impairment of negative geotaxis in Drosophila by altering age-dependent climbing speed. Exp Gerontol. 2008;43:739–48.
33. Sanchez-Santed F, Colomina MT, Herrero Hernandez E. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neurodegeneration. Cortex. 2016;74:417-26.
34. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:152-78.
35. Vieira V, Mayo SJ, Andrade IM. Geometric morphometrics of leaves of Anacardiummicrocarpum Ducke and A. occidentale L. (Anacardiaceae) from the coastal region of Piauı´, Brazil. Braz J Bot. 2014;373:315-27.
36. Wang L, Li YM, Lei L, Liu Y, Wang X, Ma KY, et al. Cranberry anthocyanin extract prolongs lifespan of fruit flies. Exp Gerontol. 2015;69:189-95.

Figure 1: Mortality of flies exposed to A. microcarpum. 25 flies of both sexes per group and in triplicate were exposed to A. microcarpum hydroalcoholic extract (AMHE), acetate fraction (AMAF) and methanolic fraction (AMMF) at different concentrations for 5 days. The number of dead flies was registered daily. No significant difference was detected.

Figure 2: Cell viability of flies exposed to A. microcarpum. Flies were treated with A. microcarpum hydroalcoholic extract (AMHE), acetate fraction (AMAF) and methanolic fraction (AMMF) in 1 % sucrose for 72 h. After treatment, flies were homogenized, centrifuged and the supernatant was used for analysis of cellular viability through Rezaruzin reduction assay. The results are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. a: no difference in relation to control group;b: differs in relation to control group considering p< 0.05.

Figure 3: Effects of A. microcarpum and paraquat on flies survival. Flies were treated with the extract (AMHE) or fractions (AMAF and AMMF) alone or in combination with paraquat 5 mM for 72 days. At the end of the treatment, the number of alive flies was registered. The results are expressed as percentage of control. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. a: no difference in relation to control group; b: differs in relation to control group, c: differs in relation to paraquat group considering p < 0.05.

Figure 4: Effects of A. microcarpum and paraquat on flies locomotor performance. Flies were treated with the extract (AMHE) or fractions (AMAF and AMMF) alone or in combination with paraquat 5 mM for 72 days. At the end of treatment, locomotor activity was evaluated by negative geotaxis, as described in 'Materials and Methods' section. A total of 5 flies per group was used in three independent experiments. a: no difference in relation to control group; b: differs in relation to control group, c: differs in relation to paraquat group considering p < 0.05.

Figure 5: Effects of A. microcarpum and paraquat on ROS production. Flies were treated with the extract (AMHE) or fractions (AMAF and AMMF) alone or in combination with paraquat 5 mM for 72 days. After treatment, ROS production was measured in the supernatant of flies as an index of oxidative stress. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of raw fluorescence as a result of DCF-DA oxidation (N=4). a: no difference in relation to control group; b: differs in relation to control group, c: differs in relation to paraquat group considering p<0.05.


Table 1: Antioxidant activity of Anacardium microcarpum extract and fractions

Table 2: Activity of antioxidant enzymes in flies exposed to the extract or fractions of A. microcarpum

[*] Corresponding Author:

Thaís Posser, Universidade Federal do Pampa Campus São Gabriel, Centro Interdisciplinar de Pesquisa em Biotecnologia (CIP/BIOTEC), Av. Antônio Trilha, 1847 Brasil; CEP: 97300-000; Tel: +555532326075, eMail: