Letter to the editor

MPL exon 10 mutations in Irish patients with a suspected myeloproliferative neoplasm

Lisa Lee Tokar1, Laura Kearney1, Stephen E. Langabeer1[*]

1Cancer Molecular Diagnostics, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

EXCLI J 2021;20:Doc197

 

Dear Editor,

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) can be broadly molecularly characterized into four main groups according to the presence of acquired mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL genes (all resulting in cytokine-independent proliferative signaling) or those without these mutations, termed “triple negative” (Grabek et al., 2020[5]). Of these groups, MPL mutations are the less common, occurring in approximately 5-10 % of MPN patients and which result in a particular phenotype (Alvarez-Larran et al., 2018[2]). The majority of MPL mutations occur in exon 10 that encodes the transmembrane domain although sporadic mutations elsewhere in the gene have been documented. Within exon 10, the mutational hotspot is the codon for Tryptophan at position W515 (Ma et al., 2011[6]). A review was performed on the frequency and type of MPL exon 10 mutations in an Irish population of patients with suspected MPN in order to inform future screening strategies.

An audit was performed on all requests for MPL exon 10 mutations at a referral center for molecular diagnosis of hematological malignancies over a three-year period from January 2018 to December 2020 inclusive. From this period, 383 requests were received in patients previously characterized as JAK2 V617F and CALR exon 9 mutation undetected. MPL exon 10 mutations were detected by a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) methodology unchanged throughout the audit period. A total of 14 (3.7 %) of patients had evidence of a W515 mutation comprising MPL W515L, W515K, W515S and W515A mutations (Figure 1(Fig. 1)). Absence of clinical details provided means ascribing mutations to either an ET or PMF phenotype is not possible.

These findings are largely in keeping with those from other European populations in respect to both frequency and spectrum of MPL exon 10 mutations with the W515L being the most prevalent (Boyd et al., 2010[3]; Cheng Pettersson et al., 2017[4]; Schnittger et al., 2009[7]). An improvement in mutation identification strategy would be to expand NGS coverage enabling routine screening for non-canonical mutations elsewhere in the coding region of MPL (Acha et al., 2019[1]). This brief survey provides a platform for continual refinement of the molecular diagnostic algorithm for MPN patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

 

References

1. Acha P, Xandri M, Fuster-Tormo F, Palomo L, Xicoy B, Cabezón M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic contribution of targeted NGS in patients with triple-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:E264-7.
2. Alvarez-Larran A, Martínez D, Arenillas L, Rubio A, Arellano-Rodrigo E, Hernández Boluda JC, et al. Essential thrombocythaemia with mutation in MPL: clinicopathological correlation and comparison with JAK2 V617F-mutated and CALR-mutated genotypes. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71:975-80.
3. Boyd EM, Bench AJ, Goday-Fernández A, Anand S, Vaghela KJ, Beer P, et al. Clinical utility of routine MPL exon 10 analysis in the diagnosis of essential thrombocythaemia and primary myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2010;149:250-7.
4. Cheng Pettersson A, Viskari A, Odén U, Sibrian C, Hansson U, Andréasson B, et al. Improved MPL mutation screening with multiplex PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Br J Haematol. 2017;179:838-40.
5. Grabek J, Straube J, Bywater M, Lane SW. MPN: The molecular drivers of disease initiation, progression and transformation and their effect on treatment. Cells. 2020;9(8):1901.
6. Ma W, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhang Z, Yeh CH, Uyeji J, et al. MPL mutation profile in JAK2 mutation-negative patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2011;20:34-9.
7. Schnittger S, Bacher U, Haferlach C, Beelen D, Bojko P, Bürkle D, et al. Characterization of 35 new cases with four different MPL W515 mutations and essential thrombocytosis or primary myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2009;94:141-4.
 
 

Figure 1: Distribution of MPL W515 mutations in an Irish population of patients with a suspected myeloproliferative neoplasm

 

[*] Corresponding Author:

Stephen E. Langabeer, Cancer Molecular Diagnostics, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Phone: +353-1-4162413, Fax: +353-1-4103513, eMail: slangabeer@stjames.ie