Research article

Neurotoxicity of mancozeb-based commercial fungicide in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells

Evelin G. Cuadros-Buenaventura1, Lenin Ramírez-Cando1[*], Ronny A. Ordoñez Sánchez1, Johnny Chimborazo2, Santiago J. Ballaz3

1School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Universidad Yachay Tech, Urcuquí, Ecuador

2School of Physical Sciences and Nanotechnology, Universidad Yachay Tech, Urcuquí, Ecuador

3School of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador

EXCLI J 2026;25:Doc133

 

Abstract

Mancozeb, a polymeric dithiocarbamate complex fungicide with zinc and manganese salts, has the potential to be neurotoxic to humans. Unfortunately, the parent molecule maneb has attracted far too much attention, limiting the available evidence on mancozeb neurotoxicity to preclinical research and non-human cells. We sought to evaluate mancozeb cytotoxicity in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells at lower concentrations than those used for maneb in in vitro investigations in order to quantify its risk for humans. Commercial mancozeb showed concentration- and time-dependent neurotoxicity in the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide reduction test (EC50= 5.9 µM and 1.7 µM at 24 h and 72 h respectively). Using the trypan blue exclusion dye, cell death toll reached around 100% after 24- and 72-hour exposure to mancozeb 1 µM and 0.5 µM respectively. Reactive oxygen species generated by mancozeb, which peaked at 4 µM, could be the cause of cell death. The number and length of neurites were concentration-dependently reduced by mancozeb at sub-µM concentrations, and this was accompanied by changes in cell biomechanical characteristics (stiffness) as determined by atomic force microscopy. The uncertainty factor obtained from our cytotoxic studies, when performing risk assessment of mancozeb, varied from 200 to 2000, which may result in detectable neurotoxicity in humans in accordance with international regulatory agencies recommendations.

See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).

Keywords: atomic force microscopy, cytotoxicity tests, mancozeb, neurons, oxidative stress, zinc

Introduction

Mancozeb (MCZ), chemically defined as manganese, zinc ethylene bis-dithiocarbamate (Mn/Zn-EBDC), is a polymeric complex with zinc salt (9 Mn(2+): 1 Zn(2+)); of the group of the dithiocarbamate pesticides, specifically used as a non-systemic (surface acting) fungicide (ECHA, 2024[21]). It is a broad-spectrum, low cost, and highly demanded agrochemical widely used in co-formulations with other fungicides as an anti-resistance treatment given its multiple-site activity mechanism of action. The use of MCZ in agriculture has been controversial due to the putative adverse effects it may have on human health (Dall'Agnol et al., 2021[14]; Cesio and Heinzen, 2024[7]). Despite being banned in the European Union, MCZ is nevertheless one of the most often used fungicides in banana crops for chemical control of the devastating Black Sigatoka disease in tropical countries like Ecuador.

An extensive number of in vitro, animal, occupational, and epidemiological studies have raised concerns regarding the safety of MCZ for humans (Tsang and Trombetta, 2007[67]; Rashid et al., 2010[58]; Hoffman et al., 2016[30]; Runkle et al., 2017[60]; Dall'Agnol et al., 2021[14]; Zhang et al., 2023[70]), being the thyroid gland (Skalny et al., 2021[63]) and the reproductive system (Bianchi et al., 2020[5]) the main targets of its harmful effects (Cesio and Heinzen, 2024[7]). The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) classed MCZ as a reproductive toxin, while the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) designated it as an endocrine disruptor. Structural similarities between MCZ and maneb (MB or Mn-EBDC), a fungicide that mimics the etiopathogenesis of Parkinson's disease or PD (Meco et al., 1994[45]; Uversky, 2004[68]), add developmental neurotoxicity problems (Mora et al., 2018[47]; Juntarawijit et al., 2020[32]; Fuhrimann et al., 2021[24]) to the increasing list of adverse effects of MCZ exposure. The potential neurotoxicity of MCZ (Domico et al., 2006[18]; Anderson et al., 2021[3]) may not solely rely on its degradation compound ethylenethiourea, the major toxic of concern (Hwang et al., 2003[31]; Cesio and Heinzen, 2024[7]), but it may be blamed on its metallic part (Hoffman et al., 2016[30]; Hernández et al., 2020[28], 2021[29]).

The evidence of neurotoxic effects of MCZ is scattered in time. Acute (30 min) and chronic (from 24 hours to 15 days) MCZ exposure through food (from 0.2-10 mg/mL in small organisms to 5-10 mg/L in bigger organisms) results in dopaminergic neuron damage in Caenorhabditis elegans (Negga et al., 2011[51]; Harrison Brody et al., 2013[27]), Drosophila melanogaster (Acosta Saraiva et al., 2021[1]), as well as in oxidative stress in the brain of Cyprinus carpio (carp) (Costa-Silva et al., 2018[12]) and Danio rerio (zebrafish) (Paganotto Leandro et al., 2021[52]). Neuronal alterations have also been investigated in primary cultures of mesencephalic neurons from rat (Domico et al., 2006[18]), in primary cultures of cerebellar cortex neurons from mice (Peña-Contreras et al., 2016[54]), and in the hypothalamus of mice in vivo (Morales-Ovalles et al., 2018[48]). In vitro research on MCZ neurotoxicity is not as extensive as MB. Only MB has been challenged in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line (Liu et al., 2022[39]), the gold standard in vitro model of dopaminergic neurons in PD (Xie et al., 2010[70]). There is little evidence of MCZ's in vitro neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells, which has not been reported in any scientific journals yet but in a thesis of da Silva (2023[13]). Consequently, it is still unclear whether MCZ increases a person´s risk of PD or affects dopaminergic neurons in the same way as MB (Meco et al., 1994[45]; Barlow et al., 2005[4]). Because the neurotoxic risk of MCZ on humans has yet to be documented in scientific literature, the goal of this study was to assess it at critical, low concentrations using the human neuroblastoma-derived SH-SY5Y cell line (Kovalevich et al., 2021[33]). This dopaminergic cell line shows an excellent in vitro sensitivity to the potential neurotoxic effects of organic pollutants like pesticides (Lopez-Suarez et al., 2022[41]).

Materials and Methods

Reagents and chemicals

For cell culture, Gibco (Carlsbad, CA) supplied Dulbecco's modified Eagle minimum essential/Ham's F-12 (DMEM/F12) plus Glutamax media fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin G/streptomycin mix, and enzyme-free PBS-based cell dissociation buffer. Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) provided the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent and the trypan blue stain. We used commercial wettable powder (WP) mancozeb 80% (Manzate® 80, UPL Ltd., Mumbai, India).

SH-SY5Y cell culture

The human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y was a generous donation of Dr. Javier Saez-Castresana (University of Navarra, Spain). Undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells (immature state) were cultured to confluence (> 80 %) in growth medium [DMEM/F12 (1:1) medium GlutaMAX, 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin G, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and kept at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95 % oxygen and 5 % carbon dioxide. The medium was replaced every 2 to 3 days. After the culture had grown, the cells were harvested using an enzyme-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-based cell dissociation solution.

We chose undifferentiated cells since retinoic acid (RA) differentiation (Cheung et al., 2009[8]) significantly changes SH-SY5Y cells frequently making them more resilient and resistant to Parkinsonian specific neurotoxins like 6-OHDA (6-hydroxydopamine) or overall oxidative stress because of improved defensive systems (Schneider et al., 2011[62]). Although not exactly resembling mature neurons, undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells have a star-like shape with short neurites that provide a useful expandable model for general in vitro neurotoxicity research. The use of RA differentiated cells is more relevant when examining the neurobiology of Alzheimer's diseases (de Medeiros et al., 2019[15]).

MCZ treatment

The concentrations of sheer fungicide were set up according to the percentage of the active ingredient specified by the manufacturer (80 % w/v). Mancozeb or MCZ (zinc;manganese(2+);N-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate; chemical formula: C40H60Mn9N20S40Zn (M.W.= 2664 g/mol); CAS Ref.#: 8018-01-7) were freshly prepared in a stock solution of sterile water just before treating the cells and then serial dilutions were directly made in the growth medium (covered concentration range: 0.1 to 16 µM). Because of the poor solubility of MCZ in water, Manzate® contains the active ingredient in a wettable powder formulation. Thanks to the combination of wetting excipients, the fungicide quickly and evenly disperses when added to water. As a result, the serial dilutions of MCZ were entirely clear, even though the stock solution was slightly cloudy.

Neuronal-viability evaluation

The first measure of cell viability was the reduction of the thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide, or MTT dye, to formazan (Mosmann, 1983[50]). In 96-well microplates, cells were seeded at a density of 6 x 104 cells per well (200 µL) for MTT assays. After a 48-hour incubation period at 37 ºC, a stock of MTT salt (5 mg/mL in PBS) was diluted tenfold in the culture medium. The most active mitochondrial reductase enzymes of living cells converted the yellow MTT salt to purple formazan after a 2-hour incubation at 37 °C, enough time for formazan crystals to form in SH-SY5Y cells (Ramirez-Cando et al., 2024[57]). After aspirating the medium, the formazan crystals were solved in 100 µL of pure DMSO. Using a microplate reader (Rayto RT-2100C Microplate Reader, Rayto Life and Analytical Sciences Co. Ltd., China), the optical density (O.D.) was measured at 560 nm with the appropriate DMSO serving as a blank. The absorbance of the control (non-treated) wells was set to 100 to standardize the absorbance values of the treated wells. A well was treated with 10 % DMSO to serve as a positive cell death control. Eight duplicates of each treatment condition were conducted for every independent experiment.

Further information on cell viability was obtained by measuring the percentage of viable cells that remained intact after applying the vital-dye trypan blue (TB) exclusion test (Strober, 2015[65]). Cells were seeded at a density of 5 x 103 cells per well (400 µL) in 24-well plates and MCZ treatments (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 µM) were applied 48 hours later. Analysis of cell viability with exclusion dye was done 24 and 72 hours after treatment. Under the light of an inverted microscope (Motic AE31E, Motic China Group Co., Hong Kong, China), TB was dissolved directly into the culture medium (0.02 % v/v) to assess the fraction of dead (TB-tangible) cells versus total cell counts at 200-fold magnification. Pictures were taken with a digital camera connected to MotiConnect software (Motic China Group Co., Hong Kong, China). Cell counts were performed using the free ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij) on a minimum of 500 cells in several fields (ten replicates per treatment condition).

Neurite outgrowth

Endpoints for screening neurotoxic effects also included the impairment of important developmental processes such as neurite outgrowth inhibition (Lee et al., 2022[37]). Up to 400 µL of culture medium was used to seed cells at a density of 5 x 103 cells/well in 24-well plates (4 wells per concentration). After 48 hours, MCZ (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 2 µM) was administered and the 24 and 72-hour treatment´s visual appearance of the cells was examined in phase-contrast images on ImageJ. Each well was the subject of digital micrographs that were saved on a PC. Neurite-like structures or neurites were measured and examined in ten replicates, with at least 500 cells in each treatment condition. The number of cells displaying neurites that were twice as long as the width of the cell body was used to measure neurite outgrowth. To rule out artifacts from varying cell counts, the averaged neurite length per cell was assessed in relation to control (untreated or 0µM) (Lee et al., 2022[37]).

Evaluation of ROS generation

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured in treated cells using the probe 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA), which is an indirect and non-specific biomarker of oxidative stress (Wang et al., 1999[69]), as our laboratory previously described (Ramirez-Cando et al., 2023[56]; 2024[57]). In brief, cells were seeded onto coverslips placed in Petri dishes at a density of 6 x 106 cells/ Petri dish with 8 mL of media. These cells were then allowed to proliferate for 48 hours, and finally the fungicide was applied for a 24-hour period. Following treatment, the cells were incubated in a growth medium with 10µM of DCF-DA for 30 minutes. They were then fixed for 10 minutes in ice-cold PBS containing 3.7 % formaldehyde, rinsed three times with PBS, allowed to dry on air, and mounted on glass slides using EntellanTM rapid mounting medium (Merck-Millipore, Germany). Cells were photographed in six fields per experimental condition at a magnification of 200x with the assistance of a Leica DM4000 B imaging fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Utilizing excitation and emission filters set at 485 ± 10 nm and 530 ± 12.5 nm, respectively, fluorescence intensity was calculated with the use of a blue filter (450-490 nm) and the Leica Application Suite X software for research. Finally, ImageJ was used to evaluate the microphotographs (four images per treatment condition).

Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) sample preparation and analysis

The corresponding calculations were performed following the cell counting to achieve an initial cell density of 2.5 x 104 cells/mL. Cells were cultured on coverslips (22 x 22 mm with a thickness of 0.13-0.17 mm) placed in four glass Petri dishes (ϕ = 30 mm). The Petri dishes were allocated into one control Petri dish and three Petri dishes for different MCZ concentrations. After placing the coverslips inside the Petri dishes, 25 mL of the DMEM solution with cells was poured into each Petri dish. The Petri dishes were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified O2 (95 %) and CO2 (5 %) atmosphere for 24 hours. Cells were then treated with MCZ at 0.1, 0.25, and 1.0 µM for 24 and 48 hours, since pilot studies demonstrated that this concentration range worked out better for morphological analysis. Samples were incubated in 3.7 % formaldehyde/PBS solution at room temperature for 20 minutes to fix cells and subsequently washed in distilled water for 3 seconds.

The Atomic Force Microscope (AFM, NX7 model, Park System) was equipped with an integrated On-axis Optic featuring a Vision Camera and an objective lens with 10x magnification for biomechanical analysis. An NSC36 Type A cantilever (Park System, Suwon, Korea) was utilized for contact analysis according to manufacturer's recommendation for contact force exceeding 0.2N/m. The AFM setting was calibrated following the manufacturer's specifications to ensure accurate analysis of the samples. Data from the AFM study of the cell's mechanical properties were collected using the XEI software (TEST Park Systems Corp, Suwon, Korea). Among the several AFM measurements, the sample analysis focused primarily on Young's modulus.

Statistics

The Rstudio free software (https://posit.co/download/rstudio-desktop/) was used for statistical analysis (Supplementary material includes R codesexcli2025-9090_supplementary_information.pdf). To measure neurite outgrowth and % of dead cells (vita dye exclusion test) replicates were conducted in four wells per MCZ concentration, results were expressed as median ± IQR to provide a clearer view of data distribution and variability capturing more information (based on boxplot), and later analyzed through the one-way ANOVA combined with the Dunnet´s test as the post-hoc analysis.

In the case of MTT data, data were normalized with respect to control, and a scatter graph was plotted from which a concentration-response curve was adjusted by a four-parameter log-logistic function utilizing the 'drm()' function within the RStudio software package 'drc()' for concentration-response analysis. The logistic function applied for this analysis is given by the expression:

where b represents the relative slope around e, c the lower limit, d the upper limit, and e the EC50.

The relative intensity of ROS was plotted on a scatter graph. Data underwent normalization against control values. A 4th order polynomial concentration-response curve was selected as the best fit as follows:

Lastly, using Monte Carlo simulations, an ANOVA was performed on the biomechanical characteristics of the cells acquired from a single AFM experiment and subsequent repeated results (up to 500 per treatment condition). Dunnett's test was performed as the post-hoc test. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. for all data analysis.

Ethics

Ethical approval was not required to use SH-SY5Y cells because they are a commercially available, established cell line, not primary human cells taken directly from a patient. In other words, no human subjects were involved, since SH-SY5Y cells are considered a pre-existing source for research.

Results

Viability of SH-SY5Y cells after MCZ treatment

The interest was to know whether acute (24 hours) to sub-chronic (72 hours) exposure to increasing concentrations (0.5 to 16 µM) of MCZ fungicide altered cell viability. Figure 2(Fig. 2) represents the concentration-response curves, plotted as the percentage of the untreated control, of the MTT viability test at different treatment periods. The ANOVAs of the MTT test results revealed a significant treatment effect at 24 hours (F(5,42) = 53.90, P < 0.001) and 72 hours (F(5,42) = 100.30, P < 0.001)). The adjusted R-squared values were set above 0.7 in both cases, which indicated a good correlation between the model predictions and real values.

Because the MTT assay is no longer acceptable as a single measure of cell viability, other parameters were required to determine whether MCZ was truly causing cell death. To corroborate MTT data, living cell cultures were examined for the presence of TB-tangible (dead) cells (Figures 3(Fig. 3) and 4(Fig. 4)). The ratio of dead cells caused by the fungicide concentration-dependently increased after 24 (F(5,60) = 117.2, P < 0.001) and 72 hours (F(5,60) = 357.1, P < 0.001) of treatment. AMCZ concentrations over 1µM and 0.5µM resulted in cell death rates of almost 100% following 24- and 72-hour exposure.

MCZ effects on neurite outgrowth and cell morphology

Figure 5(Fig. 5) shows the concentration-dependent evolution of neurite outgrowth after 24-hour exposure to MCZ. As shown in Figure 5(Fig. 5), there was a significant treatment effect in the average neurite length per cell (F(5,60) = 120.4, P < 0 .001); as well as in the number of neurites per cell (F(5,60) = 81.9, P < 0.001). The characteristic polygonal-shaped soma of SH-SY5Y cells gradually transformed into a more circular shape, while concentration-dependently decreasing in the number and length of neurites per cell.

MCZ-induced ROS

The DCHF-DA reagent exhibited a noticeable increase in fluorescence in ROS generating cells (Figure 6(Fig. 6)). The results obtained after 24-hour treatment with MCZ suggested that the fungicide prompted a significant increase in ROS levels compared to control (as no treatment). ROS level reached a maximum at 4 µM of MCZ to posteriorly decrease due to the massive cell death at higher concentrations. The concentration-response curve of ROS generation by MCZ treatment in SH-SY5Y cells moderately followed a biphasic model given by a 4th-grade polynomial curve in a range from 1 to 10 µM (Figure 7(Fig. 7)). The adjusted R-squared value was set to 0.754 (F(5,24) = 9.89, P = 0.3272).

Young´s modulus analysis

Young's modulus was used to evaluate the biomechanical response of cells, which depends on a combination of intrinsic cellular factors (like cytoskeleton, cellular shape, and molecular motors) and extrinsic factors (such as external forces, matrix stiffness, and biochemical cues), to different concentrations of MCZ. Statistical analysis via ANOVA of 500 Monte Carlo-outcomes mimicking one real-life AFM experiment revealed a significant treatment effect on the modulus of elasticity of both cell nuclei (24-hour MCZ: F(3,1996) = 175.15; P < 0.001; 48-hour MCZ: F(3,1996) = 876.06, P< 0.001) and axons (24-hour MCZ: F(3,1966) = 477.18; P < 0.001; 48-hour MCZ: F(3,1996) = 1643.21, P < 0.001) (Figure 8(Fig. 8)). Subsequent Dunnett's test pinpointed robust differences across treatments, with statistically significant deviations from untreated (control) cells. As shown in Figure 8(Fig. 8), the increase of Young's modulus was the largest after exposure to 0.25 µM of MCZ in both the axon and the nucleus, regardless of treatment time. This phenomenon suggests a possible activation of cellular response mechanisms that increased stiffness. This concentration-dependent behavior suggests that, whereas low MCZ concentrations fortify the cellular structure, higher ones undermine it (see Figure 9(Fig. 9)). More interestingly, the pattern of elastic modulus changes in the nucleus after 24-hour MCZ treatment (Figure 8A(Fig. 8)) was like the axonal response to 48-hour MCZ treatment (Figure 8C(Fig. 8)), thus highlighting nuanced, concentration-dependent effects on cell mechanics shifting from the nucleus to cell body throughout time. After 48-hour treatment, all tested concentrations of MCZ significantly influenced the nucleus's mechanical properties, underscoring the pronounced impact on cellular rigidity (Figure 8C(Fig. 8)), while in axons, only the treatment with 0.25 µM of MCZ produced a robust stiffness increase (Figure 8D(Fig. 8)).

See also Table 1(Tab. 1) and 2(Tab. 2).

Discussion

The primary results of this research showed that MCZ was cytotoxic in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, a gold standard in vitro model, even at sub-microM concentrations. This range can be utilized to research neurotoxic effects in humans at more realistic levels. In this investigation, we sought to determine the critical range of neurotoxic concentrations of MCZ, which turned out to be smaller than that reported for MB, a closely related dithiocarbamate molecule, in similar in vitro toxicological tests (Choong and Say, 2011[9]; Caputi et al., 2015[6]; Anderson et al., 2018[2], 2021[3]; Liu et al., 2022[39], 2023[40]; Conde et al., 2023[11]). Because MB does not contain Zn(2+) in its molecular structure, our findings could suggest that Zn(2+) and Mn(2+) together may have an impact on the MCZ´s higher neurotoxicity compared to MB.

To stimulate a more realistic exposure scenario, we used commercially available MCZ at concentrations hundreds of times lower than the levels of environmental exposure to the fungicide (Lori et al., 2021[42]) based on the refining of uncertainty/safety factors (Dorne and Renwick, 2005[19]). Following a 24-hour treatment, the EC50 for MCZ in our investigations ranged from 0.5 µM (trypan blue test) to 6µM (MTT test), a concentration lower than the reported EC50 for sheer MCZ (10 µM) compound in functional viability experiments utilizing mesencephalic-striatal primary co-cultures from rat brain (Soleo et al., 1996[64]). Additionally, some evidence suggests that the generation of ROS may contribute to the decline in the functional viability of rat mesencephalic neurons following a 24-hour exposure to 30 µM of MCZ (Domico et al., 2007[17]). In our experiments, ROS generation happened at a far smaller range of concentrations (1 to 10 µM) after 24-hour treatment with MCZ. As per the principle of “Use of a LOAEL rather than a NOAEL as the critical effect” (Maier, 2005[43]) most researchers currently utilize an average range of sheer MCZ concentrations higher than we used in our study. For the first time, we described the concentration-dependent effects of sub-µM concentrations of MCZ on neurite outgrowth and cell morphology in SH-SY5Y cells. We also made the decision to use Young's modulus as a measure of material elasticity (Kuznetsova et al., 2007[36]), because of the potential of MCZ to alter cellular structure and behavior. Because a higher risk of developing a neurodegenerative disease (Fang et al., 2014[23]) is linked to increased cell surface roughness and stiffness (Meyer and Amer, 1990[46]), MCZ's concentration-dependent effects in cell rigidity indicated its importance in preserving cell function and survival. All the points suggest that the use of non-human in vitro models for dopaminergic neurons may have underestimated the neurotoxic potential of MCZ in inducing mostly neural degeneration (Negga et al., 2011[51]; Harrison Brody et al., 2013[27]; Peña-Contreras et al., 2016[54]).

Due to their similar chemical structures, MB has dominated in vitro neurotoxicity research tying it to Parkinson's disease and neurodegeneration (Liu et al., 2022[39]). In contrast to most of the cell in vitro research on MB (Choong and Say, 2011[9]; Caputi et al., 2015[6]; Anderson et al., 2018[2], 2021[3]; Liu et al., 2022[39], 2023[40]; Conde et al., 2023[11]), we detected concentration-dependent neurotoxic effects for our 24-hour MCZ exposure in SH-SY5Y cells at tree- to ten-fold lower concentrations. More researchers utilize MB concentrations ranging from 10 μM to 50 μM to achieve the neurotoxic effects, except for one study (Roede et al., 2011[59]) that used a concentration range like ours (1-10 µM). While it has been documented that elevated levels of MCZ or MB can cause mitochondrial dysfunctions in SH-SY5Y cells (Domico et al., 2006[18]) and oxidative stress (Domico et al., 2007[17]), the remarkably low EC50 values observed in this investigation could indicate additional neurotoxic mechanisms, like the activation of the KCNQ2 channel, a fundamental player modulating neuronal excitability (Li et al., 2013[38]). Chemically speaking, MCZ is a polymeric complex of Mn(2+) and Zn(2+) with the ethylene bis-dithiocarbamate anion ligand. The presence of Zn(2+) at a ratio of 1 to 9 regarding Mn(2+) is what chemically separates MCZ from MB. Manganism is connected to neurodegeneration (Dobson et al., 2004[16]; Hernández et al., 2020[28]), but almost nothing is known about zinc-induced neurotoxic effects (Morris and Levenson, 2017[49]). It is possible that MCZ neurotoxicity results from a complex interaction between the organic anion, and the presence of both cations (Li et al., 2013[38]), since Zn(2+) cytotoxicity in vitro strongly depends on the chemical makeup of the anion counterpart (Pavlica et al., 2009[53]).

We focused on Zn(2+) because it could be the reason behind MCZ´s greater than what was documented for MB. In-house experiments (unpublished observations) verified that MCZ significantly increased the conductivity of the solution when dissolved in distilled water due to the breakage of the polymeric complex and subsequent cation release. The cytoskeleton organization may be impacted by the intracellular built-up of Zn(2+) (Kress et al., 1981[34]) and the dithiocarbamate monomer (Schmuck et al., 2002[61]). Furthermore, some evidence points to Zn(2+) disrupting SH-SY5Y cells' bilayer structure of the membrane (Suwalsky et al., 2009[66]) This body of evidence may help to explain the alteration in these cells' mechanical characteristics that MCZ causes, as seen in the AFM investigations.

The essential use of MCZ in a wide variety of agricultural products for daily consumption is directly related to the passive exposure of the general population to this agrochemical and its metabolites (EFSA, 2020[22]). Risk assessment analysis uses uncertainty factors to make up for information gaps about test results accuracy and the difficulty of estimating health impacts (Dorne and Renwick, 2005[19]). An agriculture worker´s skin can absorb a median of 0.9 µg/Kg bw/day (Mandić-Rajčević et al., 2020[44]), which is close to the Acceptable Operator Exposure Level (AOEL) of MCZ (3.5 µg/Kg bw/day; EC, 2009[20]). For this reason, an exposed agriculture worker´s estimated blood content of MCZ may be as high as 0.48 nM (Mandić-Rajčević et al., 2020[44]). Based on the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) in our experiments (0.1-1 μM), the highest uncertainty factor derived from the ratio of LOAEL to AOEL was between 200 and 2000 (Ramirez-Cando and Ballaz, 2025[55]). For humans, exposure via skin and lungs is acknowledged. A small occupational study measured dermal patches and found correlation between dermal pad ethylethiourea and urinary metabolite (Colosio et al., 2002[10]). This information related to toxicokinetic points out a plausible exposure distribution factor of 0.1 % to contact neural systems (considering uncertainty factor and ADME for MCZ). EPA and EFSA reports dose range 40-1200 mg/kg for genotoxicity and hepatotoxicity (Dall'Agnol et al., 2021[14]; EFSA, 2020[22]). Converting doses tested in this study fall within the reported range with a max of 60 mg/kg for cytotoxicity and 15 mg/kg for ROS as critical biological effect.

We ruled out the interference of formulation-related excipients (<1 µg/mL in culture medium) in the observed neurotoxicity of mancozeb, since regulatory agencies such as FDA and EPSA require excipients used in agrochemicals to be safe to avoid endangering the environment or human health. Furthermore, the product´s information sheet states that the hazardous ethylene thiourea (ETU) metabolite was present in less than 1g/kg (<1 ng/mL in culture medium). One possible limitation of the study is that the two metals (Mn(2+) and Zn(2+)), were not used as soluble (chloride) form in the experiments (Domico et al., 2006[18]). However, Mn(2+) and Zn(2+) are examples of soluble ions that quickly attached to proteins and other molecules (Haase et al., 2015[26]; Krężel and Maret, 2016[35]), altering their behavior in ways that may not accurately represent the neurotoxic effects of MCZ. Additionally, soluble ions can override the tight transporters that cells have for critical metals, resulting in artificial neurotoxic effects.

In addition to some preliminary research, the thesis of da Silva (2023[13]) is the first evidence of mancozeb´s neurotoxicity in a model of human dopaminergic neurons. This eliminates the problem of species extrapolation and offers a more pertinent approach for studying its neurotoxicity risk in humans. The presence of zinc (Zn(+2)) in mancozeb significantly alters its stereochemistry compared to other dithiocarbamates like maneb. This change in stereochemistry, or special arrangement of atoms within the molecule, is believed to contribute to mancozeb´s increased toxic potential. To protect the nervous system from oxidative stress-induced damage, a network of protein filaments is essential for preserving the integrity of the neuronal membrane and overall cell function (Gardiner et al., 2013[25]). It is nevertheless a target for this damage. We hypothesize that the polymer´s oxidative potential may be increased by stereochemistry that zinc cation imparts.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the detrimental effects on SH-SY5Y cells demonstrate that MCZ may have even greater neurotoxicity than its companion chemical MB for humans. Given that Zn(2+) is what chemically distinguishes MCZ from MB, our findings suggest that the cation may play a role in MCZ neurotoxicity. Following our study of MCZ's risk assessment, more studies using additional cell lines are needed to validate these results and gather information on their neurotoxicity in vivo.

Notes

Lenin Ramírez-Cando and Santiago J. Ballaz (School of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Av. Samborondón 5, 0901952-Samborondón, Ecuador; E-mail: sballazg@gmail.com) contributed equally as corresponding author.

Declaration

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PENUD) of the Ecuadorian Government. The authors specially thank Prof. Lola de Lima and Prof. Carlos Reinoso for their technical support with the chemical characterization of MCZ and with the AFM respectively.

Funding

This work was supported by the Secretaria Nacional, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SENESCYT) grant of the Ecuadorian Government (Ref. PIC-18-INE-YACHAY-002) to Santiago J. Ballaz and Lenin J. Ramirez-Cando.

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Author contribution statement

LJR-C and SJB: Conceived and design the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and contributed with reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; EGC-B: Performed the in vitro experiments, and wrote the original draft; JC and RAO: Performed AFM experiments and analysis. All the authors wrote and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Disclosure of delegation to generative AI

The authors declare that generative AI was not used during the writing and the research process. The authors are solely responsible for the finished manuscript.

 

References

1. Acosta Saraiva M, Rodrigues de Carvalho N, Kemmerich Martins I, Echeverria Macedo G, Rodrigues NR, de Brum Vieira P, et al. Mancozeb impairs mitochondrial and bioenergetic activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06007
2. Anderson CC, Aivazidis S, Kuzyk CL, Jain A, Roede JR. Acute Maneb exposure significantly alters both glycolysis and mitochondrial function in neuroblastoma cells. Toxicol Sci. 2018;165:61-73
3. Anderson CC, Marentette JO, Rauniyar AK, Prutton K, Khatri M, Matheson C, et al. Maneb alters central carbon metabolism and thiol redox status in a toxicant model of Parkinson’s disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;162:65-76
4. Barlow BK, Lee DW, Cory-Slechta DA, Opanashuk LA. Modulation of antioxidant defense systems by the environmental pesticide Maneb in dopaminergic cells. Neurotoxicology. 2005;26:63-75
5. Bianchi S, Nottola S, Torge D, Palmerini M, Necozione S, Macchiarelli G. Association between female reproductive health and Mancozeb: Systematic review of experimental models. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:2580
6. Caputi FF, Carretta D, Lattanzio F, Palmisano M, Candeletti S, Romualdi P. Proteasome subunit and opioid receptor gene expression down-regulation induced by Paraquat and Maneb in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;40:895-900
7. Cesio MV, Heinzen H. Mancozeb. In: Wexler P (ed): Encyclopedia of Toxicology (4th ed., pp 5-9). New York: Academic Press, 2024
8. Cheung YT, Lau WK, Yu MS, Lai CS, Yeung SC, So KF, et al. Effects of all-trans-retinoic acid on human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma as in vitro model in neurotoxicity research. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:127–135
9. Choong CJ, Say YH. Neuroprotection of α-synuclein under acute and chronic Rotenone and Maneb treatment is abolished by its familial Parkinson's disease mutations A30P, A53T and E46K. Neurotoxicology. 2011;32:857-863
10. Colosio C, Fustinoni S, Birindelli S, Bonomi I, De Paschale G, Mammone T, et al. Ethylenethiourea in urine as an indicator of exposure to mancozeb in vineyard workers. Toxicol Lett. 2002;134:133-40
11. Conde MA, Alza NP, Funk MI, Maniscalchi A, Benzi Juncos ON, Berge I, et al. α-Synuclein attenuates Maneb neurotoxicity through the modulation of redox-sensitive transcription factors. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2023;2023:5803323
12. Costa-Silva DG, Lopes AR, Martins IK, Leandro LP, Nunes MEM, de Carvalho NR, et al. Mancozeb exposure results in manganese accumulation and Nrf2-related antioxidant responses in the brain of common Carp Cyprinus carpio. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:15529–15540
13. da Silva S. Mecanismos de citotoxicidade induzidos pelo fungicida Mancozeb em células de neuroblastoma humano. Dissertação (mestrado). Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, 2023. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/251370
14. Dall’Agnol JC, Pezzini MF, Uribe NS, Joveleviths D. Systemic effects of the pesticide Mancozeb – A literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:4113–4120
15. de Medeiros LM, De Bastiani MA, Rico EP, Schonhofen P, Pfaffenseller B, Wollenhaupt-Aguiar B, et al. Cholinergic differentiation of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line and its potential use as an in vitro model for Alzheimer’s disease Sstudies. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:7355–7367
16. Dobson AW, Erikson KM, Aschner M. Manganese neurotoxicity. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1012:115-1128
17. Domico LM, Cooper KR, Bernard LP, Zeevalk GD. Reactive oxygen species generation by the ethylene-bis-dithiocarbamate (EBDC) fungicide Mancozeb and its contribution to neuronal toxicity in mesencephalic cells. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28:1079–1091
18. Domico LM, Zeevalk GD, Bernard LP, Cooper KR. Acute neurotoxic effects of Mancozeb and Maneb in mesencephalic neuronal cultures are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:816–825
19. Dorne JL, Renwick AG. The refinement of uncertainty/safety factors in risk assessment by the incorporation of data on toxicokinetic variability in humans. Toxicol Sci. 2005;86:20-26
20. EC, European Council: Consolidated text: Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Brussels: EC, 2009. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1107/2022-11-21
21. ECHA, European Chemicals Agency. Substance infocard: Mancozeb (ISO). 2024. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.122.419. (accessed January 1, 2024)
22. EFSA, European Food Safety Authority. Peer Review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Mancozeb. EFSA J. 2020;18(12):e05755. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/5755. (accessed January 1, 2024)
23. Fang Y, Iu C, Lui C, Zou Y, Fung CK, Li HW, et al. Investigating dynamic structural and mechanical changes of neuroblastoma cells associated with glutamate-mediated neurodegeneration. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7074
24. Fuhrimann S, Farnham A, Staudacher P, Atuhaire A, Manfioletti T, Niwagaba CB, et al. Exposure to multiple pesticides and neurobehavioral outcomes among smallholder farmers in Uganda. Environ Int. 2021;152:106477
25. Gardiner J, Overall R, Marc J. The nervous system cytoskeleton under oxidative stress. Diseases. 2013;1:36-50
26. Haase H, Hebel S, Engelhardt G, Rink L. The biochemical effects of extracellular Zn(2+) and other metal ions are severely affected by their speciation in cell culture media. Metallomics. 2015;7(1):102-11
27. Harrison Brody A, Chou E, Gray JM, Pokyrwka NJ, Raley-Susman KM. Mancozeb-induced behavioral deficits precede structural neural degeneration. Neurotoxicology. 2013;34:74–81
28. Hernández RB, Carrascal M, Abian J, Michalke B, Farina M, Gonzalez YR, et al. Manganese-induced neurotoxicity in cerebellar granule neurons due to perturbation of cell network pathways with potential implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Metallomics. 2020;12:1656-1678
29. Hernández RB, de Souza-Pinto NC, Kleinjans J, van Herwijnen M, Piepers J, Motesharei H, et al. Manganese-induced neurotoxicity through impairment of cross-talk pathways in human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y differentiated with retinoic acid. Toxics. 2021;9:348
30. Hoffman L, Trombetta L, Hardej D. Ethylene bisdithiocarbamate pesticides Maneb and Mancozeb cause metal overload in human colon cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;41:78-88
31. Hwang E-S, Cash JN, Zabik MJ. Determination of degradation products and pathways of Mancozeb and Ethylenethiourea (ETU) in solutions due to ozone and chlorine dioxide treatments. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:1341–1346
32. Juntarawijit Y, Chaichanawirote U, Rakmeesri P, Chairattanasakda P, Pumyim V, Juntarawijit C. Chlorpyrifos and other pesticide exposure and suspected developmental delay in children aged under 5 years: A case-control study in Phitsanulok, Thailand. F1000Res. 2020;9:1501
33. Kovalevich J, Santerre M, Langford D. Considerations for the use of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in neurobiology. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2311:9-23
34. Kress Y, Gaskin F, Brosnan CF, Levine S. Effects of zinc on the cytoskeletal proteins in the central nervous system of the rat. Brain Res. 1981;220(1):139-149
35. Krężel A, Maret W. The biological inorganic chemistry of zinc ions. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;611:3-19
36. Kuznetsova TG, Starodubtseva MN, Yegorenkov NI, Chizhik SA, Zhdanov RI. Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity. Micron. 2007;38:824-833
37. Lee J, Escher BI, Scholz S, Schlichting R. Inhibition of neurite outgrowth and enhanced effects compared to baseline toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. Arch Toxicol. 2022;96:1039-1053
38. Li P, Zhu J, Kong Q, Jiang B, Wan X, Yue J, et al. The ethylene bis-dithiocarbamate fungicide Mancozeb activates voltage-gated KCNQ2 potassium channel. Toxicol Lett. 2013;219:211-217
39. Liu C, Liu Z, Fang Y, Dud Z, Yan Z, Yuan X, et al. Exposure to the environmentally toxic pesticide Maneb induces Parkinson’s disease-like neurotoxicity in mice: A combined proteomic and metabolomic analysis. Chemosphere. 2022;308(Pt 2):136344
40. Liu C, Liu Z, Fang Y, Liao Z, Zhang Z, Yuan X, et al. Exposure to dithiocarbamate fungicide Maneb in vitro and in vivo: Neuronal apoptosis and underlying mechanisms. Environ Int. 2023;171:107696
41. Lopez-Suarez L, Al Awabdh S, Coumoul X, Chauvet C. The SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line, a relevant in vitro cell model for investigating neurotoxicology in human: Focus on organic pollutants. Neurotoxicology. 2022;92:131-155
42. Lori G, Tassinari R, Narciso L, Udroiu I, Sgura A, Maranghi F, et al. Toxicological comparison of Mancozeb and Oxamide fungicides at environmentally relevant concentrations by an in vitro approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8591
43. Maier A. Exposure criteria. In: Wexler P (ed): Encyclopedia of Toxicology (2nd ed., pp 306-310). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005
44. Mandić-Rajčević S, Rubino FM, Colosio C. Establishing health-based biological exposure limits for pesticides: A proof of principle study using Mancozeb. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;115:104689
45. Meco G, Bonifati V, Vanacore N, Fabrizio E. Parkinsonism after chronic exposure to the fungicide Maneb (manganese ethylene-bis-dithiocarbamate). Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20:301-305
46. Meyer G, Amer NM. Simultaneous measurement of lateral and normal forces with an optical-beam-deflection atomic force microscope. Appl Phys Lett. 1990;57:2089
47. Mora M, Córdoba L, Cano J, Hernandez-Bonilla D, Prado L, Schnaas L, et al. Prenatal Mancozeb exposure, excess manganese, and neurodevelopment at 1 year of age in the infants’ Environmental Health (ISA) study. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126:057007
48. Morales-Ovalles Y, Miranda-Contreras L, Peña-Contreras Z, Dávila-Vera D, Balza-Quintero A, Sánchez-Gil B, et al. Developmental exposure to Mancozeb induced neurochemical and morphological alterations in adult male mouse hypothalamus. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;64:139–146
49. Morris DR, Levenson CW. Neurotoxicity of zinc. Adv Neurobiol. 2017;18:303-312
50. Mosmann T. Rapid Colorimetric Assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:53–63
51. Negga R, Rudd D, Davis N, Justice A, Hatfield A, Fields A, et al. Exposure to Mn/Zn ethylene-bis-dithiocarbamate and glyphosate pesticies leads to neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurotoxicology. 2011;32:331–341
52. Paganotto Leandro L, Siqueira de Mello R, da Costa-Silva DG, Medina Nunes ME, Rubin Lopes A, Kemmerich Martins I, et al. Behavioral changes occur earlier than redox alterations in developing zebrafish exposed to Mancozeb. Environ Pollut. 2021;268(Pt B):115783
53. Pavlica S, Gaunitz F, Gebhardt R. Comparative in vitro toxicity of seven zinc-salts towards neuronal PC12 cells. Toxicol Vitro. 2009;23(4):653-659
54. Peña-Contreras Z, Miranda-Contreras L, Morales-Ovalles Y, Colmenares-Sulbarán M, Dávila-Vera D, Balza-Quintero A, et al. Atrazine and Mancozeb induce excitotoxicity and cytotoxicity in primary cultures of mouse cerebellar cortex. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2016;98:1-18
55. Ramirez-Cando LJ, Ballaz SJ. Benchmark doses (BMD) extrapolated from in vitro cytotoxicity experiments in SH-SY5Y cells using the EFSA Bayesian BMD web app: The study case of Imidacloprid. Comp Toxicol. 2025;34:100346
56. Ramirez-Cando LJ, Guzmán-Vallejos MS, Aguayo LG, Vera-Erazo FD, Ballaz SJ. Neurocytotoxicity of Imidacloprid- and Acetamiprid-based comercial insecticides over the differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Heliyon. 2023;9:e15840
57. Ramirez-Cando LJ, Rodríguez-Cazar LG, Acosta-Tobar LA, Ballaz SJ. Molecular docking analysis of Chlorpyrifos at the human α7-nAChR and its potential relationship with neurocytoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. J Environ Sci Health Part B. 2024;59:277-284
58. Rashid A, Afzal M, Kirmani A, Raina T. Pesticide and brain cancer linked in orchard farmers of Kashmir. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2010;31:110–120
59. Roede JR, Hansen JM, Go YM, Jones DP. Maneb and Paraquat-mediated neurotoxicity: Involvement of peroxiredoxin/thioredoxin system. Toxicol Sci. 2011;121:368-375
60. Runkle J, Flocks J, Economos J, Dunlop AL. A systematic review of Mancozeb as a reproductive and developmental hazard. Environ Int. 2017;99:29-42
61. Schmuck G, Ahr HJ, Mihail F, Stahl B, Kayser M. Effects of the dithiocarbamate fungicide Propineb in primary neuronal cell cultures and skeletal muscle cells of the rat. Arch Toxicol. 2002;76:414-422
62. Schneider L, Giordano S, Zelickson BR, S Johnson M, A Benavides G, Ouyang X, et al. Differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells to a neuronal phenotype changes cellular bioenergetics and the response to oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(11):2007-17
63. Skalny A, Aschner M, Paoliello M, Santamaria A, Nikitina N, Rejniuk V, et al. Endocrine-disrupting activity of Mancozeb. Arh Zav Farmaciju. 2021;71:491–507
64. Soleo L, Defazio G, Scarselli R, Zefferino R, Livrea P, Foà V. Toxicity of fungicides containing ethylene-bis-dithiocarbamate in serumless dissociated mesencephalic-striatal primary coculture. Arch Toxicol. 1996;70:678-682
65. Strober W. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2015;111:A3.B.1-3
66. Suwalsky M, Novoa V, Villena F, Sotomayor CP, Aguilar LF, Ronowska A, et al. Structural effects of Zn(2+) on cell membranes and molecular models. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103:797-804
67. Tsang MM, Trombetta LD. The protective role of chelators and antioxidants on Mancozeb-induced toxicity in rat hippocampal astrocytes. Toxicol Ind Health. 2007;23:459-70
68. Uversky VN. Neurotoxicant-induced animal models of Parkinson’s disease : Understanding the role of Rotenone, Maneb and Paraquat in neurodegeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;18:225-241
69. Wang H, Joseph JA. Quantifying cellular oxidative stress by dichlorofluorescein assay using microplate reader. Free Rad Biol Med. 1999;27:612–616
70. Xie HR, Hu LS, Li GY. SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line: in vitro cell model of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010;123:1086-1092
71. Zhang Y, Wen R, Bao J, Gong Y, Wang X. Mancozeb induces nephrotoxicity by impairing the oxidative phosphorylation pathway: A transcriptome study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;249:114471
 
 

File-Attachments

  1. excli2025-9090_supplementary_information.pdf (739,49 KB)
    Supplementary information
 
 

Figure 1: Graphical abstract

Figure 2: Toxicity of MCZ in SH-SY5Y neurons according to the MTT test. Curves represent cell viability (% of untreated control) after 24- and 72-hour exposure to increasing concentrations (from 1 µM to 16 µM) of MCZ. Concentration-response curves were created using the Logistic Sigmoidal function type 1 (see the Statistics section) based on the parameter's values listed in Table 1. Values derived from seven independent experiments (eight replicates per experiment)

Figure 3: TB test-based MCZ toxicity. Box plots indicate the percentage of dead cells after 24- and 72-hour treatments. Values were expressed as median and interquartile distance for ten replicates to more accurately depict the ANOVA results. ***P < 0.001 compared to untreated controls

Figure 4: Representative phase contrast micrographs of SH-SY5Y neurons after 24-hour treatment with MCZ. Notice dead cells stained with TB. Fungicide concentrations: (A) 0 µM, (B) 0.1 µM, (C) 0.25 µM, (D) 0.5 µM, (E) 1 µM, and (F) 2 µM

Figure 5: Effects of 24-hour treatment with MCZ (0.1-2 µM) on neurite outgrowth and branching. The graphic displays the medians and interquartile distances for ten replicates to more accurately depict the ANOVA results. ***P < 0.001 compared to untreated controls

Figure 6: Representative micrographs of SH-SY5Y cells after 24-hour MCZ treatment under fluorescence microscopy. Images (20x magnification) were obtained using the green channel (excitation and emission wavelengths: 485 nm and 530 nm respectively). [MCZ]: (A) untreated control, (B) 1 µM, (C) 2 µM (D), 4 µM, (E) 6 µM, and (F) 10 µM

Figure 7: Scatter plot of concentration-response of fluorescence emitted by SH-SY5Y cells after 24-hour treatment with MCZ. The concentration-response curve was adjusted to a 4th grade polynomial response curve based on the parameters contained in Table 2.

Figure 8: AFM analysis of MCZ (0.1 to 1 µM) on the elastic Young´s modulus. Graphic expressed as median and interquartile distance complementary to one-way ANOVA of one real-life experiment and subsequent fifty Monte Carlo simulations. Data expressed as the percentage of change relative to the modulus´ basal value. (A) Nucleus after 24-hour treatment, (B) axon after 24-hour treatment; (C) nucleus after 48-hour treatment; and (D) axon after 48-hour treatment. ***P < 0.001 compared to the untreated control

Figure 9: Representative elastic Young´s modulus images of cultured SH-SY5Y cells following 24-hour treatment with MCZ. The following are the 5 x 5 µm AFM images: The nucleus and axon of untreated (control) cells are shown in (A, B); cells treated with MCZ (0.1 µM) are shown in (C, D); cell treated with MCZ (0.25 µM) are shown in (E, F); and cells treated with MCZ (1 µM) are shown in (G, H)

 

Table 1: Concise table of parameter values for concentration-response curve modeling based on MTT-based cell viability at 24 and 72 hours

Table 2: Condensed table of parameter values (derived ROS assessment trials) for modeling the concentration-response curve based on relative intensity. Values derived from 4 replicates

[*] Corresponding Author:

Prof. PhD Lenin Ramírez-Cando, School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Universidad Yachay Tech, Av. Universitaria S/N, 10102 Urcuqui, Ecuador, eMail: lramirez@yachaytech.edu.ec